I wonder what percentage of people paying for Flickr annually are, like me, thinking, “£74 is too much for something I rarely post to, but I feel held hostage by the 20 years’ worth of old photos I’m hosting on it.”

Every year I wonder what to do, and never reach a conclusion.

Maybe £74/year is OK for hosting 4,900 photos taking up 11.6 GB? But given I rarely see or use them, it _feels_ like too much, every year forever.

Something like this seems a good idea (makes a static site of your Flickr photos and data) https://github.com/aaronpk/Flickr-Archivr

My own https://django-ditto.readthedocs.io/ is fine but if I was archiving things, static would be better than a Django site.

GitHub - aaronpk/Flickr-Archivr: Download and archive your entire Flickr account as a static website

Download and archive your entire Flickr account as a static website - aaronpk/Flickr-Archivr

GitHub
But one thing I do like about having Flickr is somewhere to upload new photos that isn’t Instagram. Not sure how to balance “want to put recent photos online somewhere open” vs “don’t want to run my own dynamic photo website forever”.
@philgyford my site builds statically every post based off a CMS backend (Craft). Images are currently in Cloudflare R2 but could also be static. What's your site built in?