fly it into the sun. it'll be cooler than that. it's all relative you see.
never mind powering it, or data links faster than 1Gbps reliably, or hardening it from cosmic and solar radiation (the faster the circuit and the smaller the process < 10nm vs > 90nm the ridiculously harder it is to protect).
general primer from a NASA scientist/engineer:
https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
@quinn According to something I read somewhere a few days ago, with a shitload of radiative sausage atta that would make it wholly impractical in avoiding microcollisions.
And that's without considering the need to add protection to avoid bits being changed by solar radiation.
It's almost as though the apartheid emerald billionaire princeling isn't actually very clever. Or something.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@kwyxz/116053711909940677
@quinn
additionnally, this just popped boosted in my TL minutes before your post: https://pouet.chapril.org/@kwyxz@mastodon.social/116053712164339631
`w;7[)
@frumble @rysiek Here is a relevant paper: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/473486main_iss_atcs_overview.pdf
I love this fucking nerd shit.
@quinn @frumble yeah. There is simply nothing out there to "engulf" anything. Space is empty.
Think of it this way:
Air is a pretty bad heat transfer medium. Water is a much better heat transfer medium. If you could put a GPU directly in water it would cool faster. That's pretty intuitive.
Space is (basically) empty, it is not even comparable as a heat transfer medium to air, because well there is no medium.
@rysiek @quinn @frumble The author of this article did an estimation of the size of the radiator needed to cool a 1GW data center in space: 1.1 million m^2
https://www.chaotropy.com/why-jeff-bezos-is-probably-wrong-predicting-ai-data-centers-in-space/

Jeff Bezos said gigawatt AI data centers will orbit Earth in 10 to 20 years. Thermodynamics makes this idea unfeasible. Without convection, waste heat must radiate through panels spanning millions of square metres. Add latency, radiation risks and costs.
@tobiaspatton @quinn @frumble yeah. These are not serious people. Nobody should be spending all this time taking their bullshit investor-targeting hype seriously.
Musk promised people on Mars "in a decade" over a decade ago. He promised robotaxis "within a decade" over a decade ago.
The guy promises people on Mars but can't get a drunken dude driven home.
@rysiek @tobiaspatton @quinn @frumble
Maybe the giant radiators would shade the earth...
@Anne_Delong obligatory Simpsons reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjdMYyjnmks

This artical goes into it a little.
https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
The [ISS] thermal radiator panel system measures 13.6m x 3.12 m, i.e., roughly 42.5 square metres. If we use 200kW as a baseline and assume all of that power will be fed to GPUs, we'd need a system 12.5 times bigger, i.e., roughly 531 square metres, or about 2.6 times the size of the relevant solar array. This is now going to be a very large satellite, dwarfing the ISS in area, all for the equivalent of three standard server racks on Earth.
You would have to liquid cool the GPUs and then pipe the coolant to massive radiative cooling panels.
There is no way this would be cheaper or more practical then data center on earth.
But I suppose they have to line up the next grift for when the AI bubble pops.
@eric @quinn @frumble @rysiek
it is all about inflating the valuation for the IPO.
see https://mastodon.social/@PeterSommerlad/116028605224882753
@quinn ah fair. Well then we also have an answer to your question:
NOTHING IS EVER ALLOWED TO OVERHEAT!
Oof, that was simple!
@bituur_esztreym @rysiek @quinn
The Spider-Verse Fediverse!
There's an easy answer to this question.
You don't.
The computers exceedingly short lifespan will be decided in a race between being cooked by waste heat, being destroyed by radiation, or burning up in reentry.
Large data centers in Earth orbit is just bullshit being spewed to sound good to investors to keep his stock price from plummeting to Earth.
Here's someone more qualified saying no.
https://www.eetimes.com/the-hidden-physics-of-running-data-centers-in-orbit/

@quinn it's difficult. But when the masses revolt against AI, the space based data centres will be harder to take out.
* Not my theory, just an interesting one I read elsewhere.