It’s weird that we’ve abandoned linking to the article (which describes the killing as the result of him clumsily showing off his new glock to his daughter shortly after dinner) and defaulted to a link to an article to a screenshot of a tweet by some random internet influencers looking to stir the pot.

The killer said it was an accident and there are no living witnesses.

The grand jury refused to indict based on the evidence presented in the case.

The victim’s entire family was in the house at the time of the killing. There were numerous witnesses.

I don’t understand the logic here. If you’re in your basement, and someone gets stabbed in your kitchen, you somehow know the stabber’s intent?

Is this a normal psychic power? I don’t think I have it.

There were no witnesses. Unless you count the killer.

If you’re in your basement, and someone gets stabbed in your kitchen, you somehow know the stabber’s intent?

Go back and read the original fucking article. If you’re really curious, go scrounge up the actual facts of the case presented to the grand jury.

“Okay, but what if I’m skeptical? What if I’m double skeptical? What if I’m fully incredulous? Then can I believe her father killed her in cold blood?” Sure. Believe whatever fairy tale you want to tell yourself.