Firstdog OnthemoonFeb 6
We finally understand what we are seeing... forever shocked no longer surprised. Today's cartoon... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2026/feb/06/how-many-nameless-trafficked-children-how-many-how-many
How many nameless trafficked children… how many… how many

Can I somehow unknow this? Is that OK? Please

The Guardian
Show threadbirbFeb 6
@firstdogonthemoon not taking a moral stance makes you complicit. here your ambiguity is actively discouraging others from taking a moral stance
Show threadQuiss42
@birb
Do I get you right: You're accusing @firstdogonthemoon of not taking a moral stance? Sheesh.
Feb 6 at 6:58amFedilab
Show threadbirbFeb 6
@quiss42 @firstdogonthemoon if you look at the comments, other people have already read his last line as a shared allowance to be wilfully ignorant. presenting the truth without its moral dimension is immoral, so any dealing with important truths should be done carefully and with clear communication
Show threadbirbFeb 6
@quiss42 @firstdogonthemoon in other words, I'm not accusing them of being immoral, but they are not clearly communicating a moral stance when the topic calls for it
Show threadChookMother 🇦🇺🦘Feb 6

@birb

I'm sorry that you don't understand irony.

@quiss42 @firstdogonthemoon

Show threadKerr Avonsen (she/her)Feb 6
@birb @quiss42 @firstdogonthemoon "A shared allowance to be willfully ignorant"?
If they think that, they haven't been paying attention. That is not the First Dog we know.
Show threadChookMother 🇦🇺🦘Feb 7

@birb

We're all going to be judged by comments others make on our posts now?

Heaven help us all!

@firstdogonthemoon