LISTEN, I survey a lot of more social media; more than most of you ever do, and I can tell you this with some certainty.

99.999% of all social posts we see — even by the most famous scholars historians, journalists and pundits — are all about the contours or specific examples of our “MAGA/Trump” problem. It’s become a kind of national horror-porn. A bottomless well of nutrients for doom-scrollers that is powering the (often-shrinking) careers of many respected people and institutions, but …

has very little value beyond that.

Sadly, perhaps even tragically, a much bigger problem is that almost none of them are proposing or even promoting any solutions to any part of our problems.

Diagnosing socio-political problems is really pretty easy: almost anybody can do it. And almost everyone has in some form or another.

But proposing even pieces of solutions — or even some process to arrive at solutions — requires some degree of intellectual courage.

Unfortunately very few of the …

people we want so desperately to respect have very much of said courage. And that, in my view, is America’s — and perhaps the modern world’s — biggest single problem.

And we’re all partly to blame for this by allowing our society to evolve with almost no mechanisms for respecting or transmitting any form of traditions, norms, or rules of order from one generation to the next. Most of us don’t trust anyone anymore, because there are no accepted community frameworks for building and sharing …

that trust. Almost everyone seems to be largely working with norms and values assimilated from popular culture. Especially from television and films. This is why so much of what politicians say sounds so cliché. Because it is cliché. They watch and learn from the same video dreck we’ve all been bombarded with since we were children. Few ever read or study philosophy or the classic literature anymore, once the transmission mechanism for most shared human values. Hell, many don’t read …

anything at all anymore. They get their learning from pop culture and entertainment, not from any kind of accepted frameworks for what life and society should value.

If religion ever did have any real value, it was at least providing frameworks that a large number of people would abide by. It’s no longer a big (or admitted) part of most people’s lives, but nothing has replaced it as a transmission source for shared values.

And MAGA has exploited all these conditions and cultural failures. …

By routinely and forcefully shouting down almost any credible positions or opinions, they have made it very risky for anyone with status or stature to speak up on just about everything.

Consequently, few speak much at all, but when they do, it’s mostly outrage, outcry, or contempt for what’s happening to us. Proposing even the smallest practical steps we MIGHT take is left to the “extremists” who we’re all implicitly taught to distrust because, well, “they’re extremists.” As a result, the …

closest we come to reforming anything is untenable demands such as “Abolish Ice,” as if that was really some kind of easily effected solution. It’s not remotely that. It’s just political rhetoric with absolutely no serious operational value. But someone with proposals to “Reform Ice” will never even be heard, because magnifying such reasonable proposals carries that inherent risk that either MAGA or the Left will shout it down, mock it, or ignore it. No one wants to be seen shouting into a …
@shoq for me, calling out Abolish ICE as your example here is enacting the same paralyzing effect that you are describing in your broader point. I find the abolition of ICE to be a reasonable, concrete step that people are proposing, and I perceive its use as an example here as being a more thoughtful and well-articulated version of the phenomenon you’re describing.
It’s no different than the abolish the police movement in the first place. that was an equally extremist take that even Black communities hated, And this is impossible to separate from that. Same rhetorical driver, similar context. When you have to explain what you don’t mean by a slogan, you’re already losing politically. We may just disagree on our fundamental take on what practical and achievable politics are in the USA. And that would probably be the case during good and more reasonable …
times, which these are not :)