There’s a huge difference about the way the media is reporting the horrific information uncovered in these files.

Independent media, who are having to read the files themselves and view the images and the videos, you can just see that they are damaged by that information because it’s so disturbing. And the vast amount of it is so overwhelming. You can see that they’re upset by it.

But when you watch the mainstream media, the “Reporters” aren’t really directly reading or viewing any of the file information. They’re just getting a summary from somebody else in their organization who’s reading it for them. And so they can report it very disinterested. They’re actually downplaying it. It makes you think they seem more professional, but it’s just because reporters in the mainstream media are not actually looking at all this awful stuff, and if they did, I think they would be reporting it much more accurately as the devastating and horrible thing it really is.

And it appears the incriminating stuff is all redacted anyway. There is nothing reported yet about actual rapes of underage girls even though that’s what this was all about. Using protecting the girls’ identities and active investigatioins as an excuse they just cut the entire evidence of the rapes out of the material it appears.

So the media has an easy out, just reporting on who talked to epstein, who went to a party, and nothing of the details of these rapes, even as those details wouldn’t identify anyone to any person that doesn’t already know about it.

We need an independent monitor to decide what to release or not. If only we could leak the files, news organizations could decide what to redact, I would trust a number of them keeping each other honest far more than the government.