a whole class of the old computers i like will become infinitely less usable under linux in particular the moment toolkits stop supporting X, and this is a genuine problem that should be taken seriously instead of saying "you should just buy shiny new AI-enabled razor thin bendable NPU thing and encourage the bastards ruining tech and just use wayland bro"
@wyatt framing it as about supporting "the old computers I like" is really not that persuasive tbh. you, personally, preferring older computers is not a reason anyone owes you continued X development. and to anticipate the obvious response: ewaste is a huge problem in general and should be properly reckoned with, but I don't believe the number of computers affected (those that are in active use with up-to-date graphical desktops, and could continue being so for a while yet, but that are old enough that they absolutely need X) is actually all that significant.
@hatzka
1) gain some sympathy for the fact that others are not you and that other value structures are not inherently wrong
2) I did not ask you
3) what did you possibly intend to accomplish by posting this (other than pissing me the fuck off)?
4) there's a secret fourth thing I was thinking of saying to you but I am abstaining from saying it in case I am totally misconstruing something and you aren't actually being a colossal "gnome maintainer" style jerk
@wyatt was this meant to be a vent post? I'm genuinely sorry if I misunderstood. it seemed to me to be trying to persuade the reader (not me personally ofc, but whoever came across it) so I responded with that in mind.
@hatzka I thought my initial posts calling people "the bastards ruining tech" was enough of a sign that I was angry

I would like for everyone to reconsider what they actually fucking need, and why these changes are actually fucking necessary.
@wyatt of course I can tell you're angry, but that's not what I meant. if you were only venting, this would be absolutely on me for misunderstanding. but it sounds to me like you are trying to convince people, and if that's the case, then I think it's only fair to expect them (us) to respond in kind. isn't that how conversation works? (this is not a rhetorical question; it's still entirely possible I've misunderstood what you were/are doing)
@hatzka if you aren't actively anti-capitalist at every turn i do not have common ground with you.
"no one has any responsibility to maintain X" isn't what this is about, it's about compassion for others and realising that what we're doing (churning out ever more overpowered hardware to do the same tasks we were doing 20 years ago, but with ever sloppier code) is not sustainable or necessary. Sites that worked fine on my computer 15 years ago now bring it to its knees (youtube, facebook, etc.) - and the quality of life of the platforms has decreased in the same time span. There is no reason to buy new hardware except for unsympathetic jerks and project managers who don't value anything except for getting the product out the door. And in my opinion we should not use that software and encourage them
@wyatt this is a much better argument than your original post, which read as essentially "my personal favorite hardware is too old to run Wayland and I am going to make it everyone else's problem". (if this characterization of your post feels unfair, consider how it feels for the pro-Wayland side to be described as saying "you should just buy shiny new AI-enabled razor thin bendable NPU thing and encourage the bastards ruining tech", when Wayland didn't cause any of the other problems you mention with more recent hardware.)