wyatta whole class of the old computers i like will become infinitely less usable under linux in particular the moment toolkits stop supporting X, and this is a genuine problem that should be taken seriously instead of saying "you should just buy shiny new AI-enabled razor thin bendable NPU thing and encourage the bastards ruining tech and just use wayland bro"
hatzka@wyatt framing it as about supporting "the old computers I like" is really not that persuasive tbh. you, personally, preferring older computers is not a reason anyone owes you continued X development. and to anticipate the obvious response: ewaste is a huge problem in general and should be properly reckoned with, but I don't believe the number of computers affected (those that are in active use with up-to-date graphical desktops, and could continue being so for a while yet, but that are old enough that they absolutely need X) is actually all that significant.
@hatzka
1) gain some sympathy for the fact that others are not you and that other value structures are not inherently wrong
2) I did not ask you
3) what did you possibly intend to accomplish by posting this (other than pissing me the fuck off)?
4) there's a secret fourth thing I was thinking of saying to you but I am abstaining from saying it in case I am totally misconstruing something and you aren't actually being a colossal "gnome maintainer" style jerk
1) gain some sympathy for the fact that others are not you and that other value structures are not inherently wrong
2) I did not ask you
3) what did you possibly intend to accomplish by posting this (other than pissing me the fuck off)?
4) there's a secret fourth thing I was thinking of saying to you but I am abstaining from saying it in case I am totally misconstruing something and you aren't actually being a colossal "gnome maintainer" style jerk
@wyatt was this meant to be a vent post? I'm genuinely sorry if I misunderstood. it seemed to me to be trying to persuade the reader (not me personally ofc, but whoever came across it) so I responded with that in mind.
@hatzka it is me saying that there is no fucking reason we need so much overhead and so many pointless upsets in how we program and run software. Graphical interfaces have not fundamentally changed such that new toolkits and graphics subsystems are required, and so forcing people to get newer, shittier hardware because of the greed and absolutely piss-poor programming of a few companies (yes, red hat is a company, IBM is a company, this isn't just about microsoft and apple and oracle, the usual suspects for anything horrible in tech) just for the pursuit of shiny new thing is deeply upsetting to me.
Nearly anything we have now could be done 20 years ago and we already had toolkits back then to make X more bearable. This is change for the sake of change and to keep people employed maintaining this stupid additional infrastructure and porting shit to it
Nearly anything we have now could be done 20 years ago and we already had toolkits back then to make X more bearable. This is change for the sake of change and to keep people employed maintaining this stupid additional infrastructure and porting shit to it
@hatzka (and people telling me that I am wrong for liking what I like, actually, and that I just need to throw more shit into a dump or burn the plastic away to recover the copper and gold content, piss me off because it shows a shallow view of software that i've come to expect from career oriented programmers rather than ones that care about quality)