Netflix says users can cancel service if HBO Max merger makes it too expensive
Netflix says users can cancel service if HBO Max merger makes it too expensive
I do, because historically I want to support the people making content I love.
However, the distribution channels and situation is nearing abysmal quality while gobbling up more and more money. So long term… I dunno… I only maintain 2-3 streaming services at a time, and one is CBC, which I won’t be dropping.
I only maintain 2-3 streaming services at a time
This is the way. Unless their prices fall of a cliff, I’ll only ever be doing 1-2 services at a time. There’s always plenty to get caught up on
I have a budget I set and I spend across a couple creatives and media companies, but they are direct payments tonth creatives themselves. I have no issues paying for people to create works.
But such a microscopic portion of any streaming service payment, coupled with deeply toxic, dark patterned business models, not to mention how the business structure has distorted the model for creative works.
I have views on property rights that I know aren’t the most popular on a dot world or even some of the more radical instances. I know a few share it, but I know most don’t, but I genuinely don’t believe in copyright.
Copyright (and patent law) is deeply flawed and has been abused far beyond its original intent.
I would very much like reform.
that’s the fun part, basically none of the money you pay actually goes to the people who made the thing.
like 95-100% of the money that the crew of a movie or TV show makes is paid to them during production. There might be a handful of crew, typically writers, actors, and directors who get residuals, but that’s typically a very small fraction of the total amount they got paid.
Your money goes to the studio who produced the film/show in order to recoup their investment. and in my experience, the studio doesn’t actually give a shit about the creatives who made the thing you love. They’ll get rid of them for someone cheaper at the first opportunity, and a lot of them are trying to get rid of them for AI right now.
This 100%.
It has been a weird journey for me, from “Netflix is elevating all of these great comedies!” To Netflix is buying competitors to keep every creator vulnerable.
That said, Dropout, Nebula and Curiosity Stream all seem pretty ethical toward creators. I think the combination of all three costs less than Netflix. (Though I’ve been on the Netflix boycott for awhile now.)
Also, I can’t get over Dropout’s ad series encouraging users to share a password to let someone try DropOut. Boss move.
This was exactly the way I thought of my spending habits for a long time. Then a few years ago, Netflix prohibited password sharing, a soft feature they had specifically encouraged in the past, with the explicit purpose of desperately generating additional revenue as other growth streams plateaued. When most users just kind of accepted it, the dam broke and all the other services followed suit.
That was the final straw for me, on top of the proliferation of dedicated per-studio services, price hikes, and pricing tiers that created needless feature lock-outs. As a consumer I get dicked around in every sector in which I’m forced to participate, but this is one sector where I have an option to withdraw from the dicking.
They are just like us, they are born, they die, they pay taxes…oh wait.
Please do read that as sarcasm. These turdlike meat bags (I won’t call them human) just view others are numbers. ‘Enough squeezed humans/others/numbers’ means a bigger yacht and more bragging power at the country club.
They need shaming at worst, dragging out in the street is better
It does if you inflate the price of the base tier, then add a new lower tier at the old price. With ads.
Or if you have less content and charge more.
Or if you stop making content with creatives having control and instead make it based on producer led content.
Or if you start changing up the cover art of different content and sprinkle it in different categories to give the appearance of more content.
Or if you claim to be about freedom of speech and not judging content based on being offensive or controversial, but then fire workers that you feel are offensive or controversial.
Or if you start buying your competition with the intention of having less competition.
It does if you inflate the price of the base tier, then add a new lower tier at the old price. With ads.
That’s not enshittification that’s a price increase. They’re not obligated to keep the same price point forever.
Or if you have less content and charge more.
Not enshittification because that’s literally how the industry works. Now imagine they have literally all the content, won’t you be crying it’s a MONOPOLY, KILL THEM ASAP?
Or if you stop making content with creatives having control and instead make it based on producer led content.
Not enshittification.
Or if you start changing up the cover art of different content and sprinkle it in different categories to give the appearance of more content.
Wow person learns how algorithms and categories work. What a revelation.
Or if you claim to be about freedom of speech and not judging content based on being offensive or controversial, but then fire workers that you feel are offensive or controversial.
Not enshittification.
Or if you start buying your competition with the intention of having less competition.
Didn’t you just say above you wanted more content?
This is just people crying about something they don’t like. If you don’t want to use the service don’t use it.
What has Netflix enshittified?
Their content.
They consider their product to be “Second Screen,” which mean it is meant to be consumed while you are on your phone. Matt Damon recently talked about the rules of making a Netflix video, and one of them is that you have to repeat your plot objective several times, so the people who are “watching” while on their phones will get it.
They also mandate the use of certain cameras and lenses and other equipment, to ensure that their productions have a similar look across the platform.
They have lots of other rules that compromise quality and artistic integrity in favor of branding and profit.
That counts as enshittification to me.
Also, enshittification is not in spell check.
Is it irony to quote all the enshittification steps and then demonstrate you know nothing about enshittification by saying they’re good things?
If they were value-added features, we could opt-out and pay the same (plus inflation) without them. None of the extra shit has any value to my house, for instance.
I never implied they’re good, I implied it’s not enshittification. There’s a difference.
If they were value-added features, we could opt-out and pay the same (plus inflation) without them.
This doesn’t even make sense because they were added to your account at no charge. That means they would actually have to decrease the price if you want to exclude them.
I am genuinely impressed by my local library’s collection of DVDs. Rows upon rows upon rows. I just went the other day and was overwhelmed, in a good way.
I still sail the high seas for things I can’t find elsewhere, but boy is it nice to pop a free DVD into my Playstation without the hassle of transferring files.