Love the meme but also hate the drivel that fills the comment sections on these types of things. People immediately start talking past each other. Half state unquantifiable assertions as fact (“…a computer doesn’t, like, know what an apple is maaan…”) and half pretend that making a sufficiently complex model of the human mind lets them ignore the Hard Problems of Consciousness (“…but, like, what if we just gave it a bigger context window…”).

It’s actually pretty fun to theorize if you ditch the tribalism. Stuff like the physical constraints of the human brain, what an “artificial mind” could be and what making one could mean practically/philosophically. There’s a lot of interesting research and analysis out there and it can help any of us grapple with the human condition.

But alas, we can’t have that. An LLM can be a semi-interesting toy to spark a discussion but everyone has some kind of Pavlovian reaction to the topic from the real world shit storm we live in.

Hard problem of consciousness - Wikipedia

Is it possible that you try to convince yourself that you are not in any tribe just becouse you picked yours by being contraitan to two tribes that you haslty drew with crude labels?

WE picked our position match our convictions! THEY picked the convictions to match their position. And we know which is which becouse we know which one is ME.

I believe “tribalism” refers to the refusal to accept new evidence.
And there is a good evidence that everybody tend to do it. Except of us, obviously.
No one’s saying that anyone never does it. The context is this thread and others like it. One scenario in which it happens with some people.