Reading the Files got me like
Reading the Files got me like
There seems to be a correlation between being wealthy and being a thoughtless sociopath.
Who’da thunk
Sociopathy isn’t a specific personality disorder
It’s arguably encompassed by the “mental defects” part, though 🤷
It’s not a specific mental defect either. It’s just a sophistic appeal to plausible sounding psychology speak. Psychobabble.
Psychology experts feel the same way hearing “sociopath” as engineering experts feel hearing “quantum capacitor” or “chronometric transistor”. It’s like when a hacker on TV says they’ve decompiled the mainframe.
Some psychologists have been charitable and decided the pop culture understanding is close enough to ASPD that it might as well mean ASPD, and I think they’re wrong. If laypeople want to be understood they should use the correct words. Using the wrong words has serious consequences when we’re talking about mental health.
I once watched two idiots online argue between using sociopathy or psychopathy to describe a fictional character. Is there a difference? yes, kinda. Does it matter? no. It was mostly harmless, but psychologists avoid actively to use either term ever, both in discussions of cases and official reports. We stick to the definitions and terms on diagnosis manuals, and we focus on describing symptoms mostly. Diagnosis are long winded and arduous decisions that require observation, tests, logical argumentation about applicability of criteria. The goal is to help the patient, diagnosis is but a tool not the end goal. Either term appear exactly once on the DSM-V, and they appear together on ASPD.
But people love to argue online about asinine topics.
Back in the day the super rich couldn’t bother to write any better, but at least they had the decency to hire a secretary so their messages were even somewhat legible. Seems like the habit of dictating your messages has all but vanished, even in professional contexts.
Maybe the 14-16 year olds they now “hire” are too young to write professionally, compared to the 18-20 somethings of yesteryears.
Hey hello there I had never heard yesteryears and it is exquisite.
Thank you very much
Sure, but a lot of that is holdovers from back when you had to put pieces of dead trees into a cryptographic mangler just to tell your secret lover that y’all’re gonna get your freak on that motel by the movie theater.
Nowadays, anyone can type “U up?”
This is honestly the first I’d thought about it…but language has always been dynamic and organic. Rapid communication has already led to rapid evolution of language and distribution of slang.
Then you get LLMs slurping up all this content and condensing it and adding their own language into the pile.
Eventually the majority of what they intake will be the output of all the other LLMs, and then it’s a feedback loop.
If I write a crappy email, I get reprimanded by the boss, or I lose a contract, or people just stop emailing me.
If a billionaire writes a crappy email, their correspondent still wants their money.
The richest guy I know (I know two people who own majorities of companies worth over a billion, although one recently sold and he’s not quite a billionaire) they both have personal assistants who do all their work for them and write emails etc. which leaves them free to talk to people. And I’ll be honest, they are on business all the time, they’re obsessed. Even if it’s someone else’s business.
You know who I know who write their own emails and are great communicators? Lawyers. I know a few lawyers. They’re exhausting, but they actually have great work ethics usually.
they simply don’t have to care. in a similar way where jobs was wearing jeans and black shirt while everyone around him was saluting in suits. he didn’t have to.
also these messages were supposed to be private, lot of our signal/whatsapp chats also look less professional than work emails.
iirc it’s tls secured between client and server and again between servers. So no e2ee, but if you trust your provider, everything should be good.
iirc law enforcment regularly forces providers to reveal content of client’s mailboxes.
but if you trust your provider
Which you should never do. They might look good and safe today, but all it takes is a subpoena or a change in management and they will spill all the secrets. Most likely past and present.
Basically, don’t do illegal shit over unencrypted forms of communications. But the billionares are not the smartest people, or Epstein thought he was protected enough that keeping a record of his co-conspirators and their crimes would protect him.
Yep, the issue is that the server stores the messages centrally in plaintext, and most email users nowadays assume that the server always has a copy. That’s why we have PGP and ring-of-trust, and why there used to be a lot of push to use that with especially E-mail. Especially with the preparation to post-quantum era, any communication you actually want to stay secret should be encrypted with (symmetric) keys you exchange in person. That way there’s no log or key exchange that someone can see or store, and thus break in the future.
Unfortunately people in general deemed the centralized solutions “good enough”, and for “more secure” contexts we got the abysmally horrible solutions like Secure Mail. PGP’s problem was, that the trust needed to be established in a distributed manner outside normal communication which the layperson found confusing. It also was problematic in corporate contexts, as proper client-side encryption meant that the company could no longer scan through employee messages.
It’s still the best way to make e-mail safe, though.
Most of the internet, nowadays, is encrypted on transmission.
Some things are end-to-end encrypted, some things are only encrypted for transmission, and rarely (nowadays) things are not encrypted at all.
Emails are encrypted for transmission.
That means, your email is readable on your computer, on your email server, on their email server and on their computer. Your email is not readable by your router, their router, your ISP, their ISP, or anyone operating a machine over which the transmission happens.
There are end-to-end encryption for email but you would know if you would use it.
Emails are encrypted for transmission.
no. they may be and probably most of them are, but they are not by design. mx to mx can still go in plaintext.