ooli3A cool guide to everyday etiquette no one teaches you
I see a lot of comments dismissing the information because of it use of AI for the graphics. Would it being received better if the post was simpli a list of bullet points? I couldn’t do graphics if my life depended on it, but I still feel this presentation is easier to digest and process than it’d be if it was plain text, so I’d probably go the same route of using AI to better convey what I’m trying to.
I’m thinking this through, myself.
- there are people, companies, and systems that are making the world a worse place, though people may disagree on exactly what/who those are.
- a fair number of people on Lemmy/Piefed believe that GenAI as promoted by companies like OpenAI is one of those things that are making the world a worse place.
- to such people, using GenAI for convenience does not excuse anyone from contributing to companies/systems that are making the world a worse place.
So I guess if someone honestly believes that GenAI is not bad, then they are being morally consistent when they use it. However, if they’re making an infographic, the point of it may be lost on those who believe that GenAI is bad and thus have a morally consistent aversion to it.
Now, IS GenAI really that bad? That argument seems to be raging elsewhere in this thread.
Yeah, I agree. The post isn’t about GenAI but we can’t engage with the content because we’re still having a moral discussion on how the content was created.
Problem is, I don’t think it’s a question that can be answered in such a discussion. Ethics of AI is a pretty complex field.