I see a lot of comments dismissing the information because of it use of AI for the graphics. Would it being received better if the post was simpli a list of bullet points? I couldn’t do graphics if my life depended on it, but I still feel this presentation is easier to digest and process than it’d be if it was plain text, so I’d probably go the same route of using AI to better convey what I’m trying to.

Do you think the only choices are AI art or not?

Whoever “made” this could have easily used the plethora of media freely available to them, pre-made by human artists, for each point in this. Clipart is decades old.

Or they could absolutely ditch the artwork and choose a different way to present this! The de-google guides that always pop up rarely have images. It’s all simple shapes that are easy to read and look at.

There is absolutely zero need for AI here.

I couldn’t do graphics if my life depended on it

Yes you can, you just don’t want to put in the effort. Get drawing.

So if I’m understanding correctly, the vox populi is that any AI-generated image is automatically bad/slop/misuse? Are we satanizing AI now?

When were we not?

That seems a very narrow and binary perspective. There’s no room for nuance, it’s simply “AI is bad and we won’t talk further about it”.

Your question was specific to AI images, not AI in general. There’s plenty of nuance to be had with AI, but art is one thing it should never do.