Yumechi | ゆめち 
“宣传食品“低脂”或“无糖”都是在误导消费者，类似 1950 年代宣传香烟的过滤嘴是一种保护性创新，实际上几乎没有任何实质性益处。”
很讨厌science washing with half fact half bluffing. 香烟过滤嘴实际不能减少harmful substance exposure 似乎是有研究支持的，不过不是很懂“无糖都是在误导消费者...实际上没有任何实质性益处"的factual basis在哪里？
化学事实就是没有卡路里的食物不升糖，在那里speculate“哦但是这样会让你更想吃甜的东西”，sure，不是很了解数据支持在哪里，糖不是可卡因，人可以不抽大麻活下去，没有人能“不升糖”活下去。
引用的研究有十几屏 只有一段是在讲非香烟和高糖食物的，而且提及的相当tengential，根本不是本文主旨The food industry has adopted nearly identical strategies. Labels such as “low fat” and “sugar free” are widely used to market UPFs that still contain highly reinforcing combinations of ingredients.199我们来看看引用199的结论实际是什么Low-content nutrient claims are a common feature among US household food and beverage purchases, and are more common among RTD beverages than packaged foods. However, low-content nutrient claims are not necessarily reliable indicators of a product’s nutritional quality. When examined collectively, packaged food and beverage purchases with any low-/no-content claim did have lower mean energy, total sugar, total fat, and sodium densities relative to purchases with no such claim, but substantial variation in nutrient density by claim type and within food groups indicates that some claims may have limited utility for certain types of foods or nutrients. A key question for future research will be to examine how these claims affect consumer choice, as well as how claims interact with other common strategies, like sales or price promotions, to influence purchasing behavior and ultimately, dietary quality.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.011并不觉得这个引用很准确的表达了原文的意思。。，原文只是说不能片面的看marketing speak或者单方面的“低”而要综合考虑营养质量，完全没有说“健康食品”是噱头
RE: https://mas.to/users/solidotbot/statuses/116007293275373269
很讨厌science washing with half fact half bluffing. 香烟过滤嘴实际不能减少harmful substance exposure 似乎是有研究支持的，不过不是很懂“无糖都是在误导消费者...实际上没有任何实质性益处"的factual basis在哪里？
化学事实就是没有卡路里的食物不升糖，在那里speculate“哦但是这样会让你更想吃甜的东西”，sure，不是很了解数据支持在哪里，糖不是可卡因，人可以不抽大麻活下去，没有人能“不升糖”活下去。
引用的研究有十几屏 只有一段是在讲非香烟和高糖食物的，而且提及的相当tengential，根本不是本文主旨The food industry has adopted nearly identical strategies. Labels such as “low fat” and “sugar free” are widely used to market UPFs that still contain highly reinforcing combinations of ingredients.199我们来看看引用199的结论实际是什么Low-content nutrient claims are a common feature among US household food and beverage purchases, and are more common among RTD beverages than packaged foods. However, low-content nutrient claims are not necessarily reliable indicators of a product’s nutritional quality. When examined collectively, packaged food and beverage purchases with any low-/no-content claim did have lower mean energy, total sugar, total fat, and sodium densities relative to purchases with no such claim, but substantial variation in nutrient density by claim type and within food groups indicates that some claims may have limited utility for certain types of foods or nutrients. A key question for future research will be to examine how these claims affect consumer choice, as well as how claims interact with other common strategies, like sales or price promotions, to influence purchasing behavior and ultimately, dietary quality.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.011并不觉得这个引用很准确的表达了原文的意思。。，原文只是说不能片面的看marketing speak或者单方面的“低”而要综合考虑营养质量，完全没有说“健康食品”是噱头
RE: https://mas.to/users/solidotbot/statuses/116007293275373269
Matrew File