Legal action over 'unfair' Steam game store prices given go ahead

https://lemmy.world/post/42467891

Legal action over 'unfair' Steam game store prices given go ahead - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

alleges Valve “forces” game publishers to sign up to conditions which prevents them from selling their titles earlier or for less on rival platforms.

Given Epic is gives away games for free. This assertion about Valve is laughable.

Valve forces price parity with all platforms. So if they have lower charges, that saving cannot be passed on to the customer and so stops price competition.

I thought that only applied to steam keys?

You can sell your game for whatever you want elsewhere, but if you want them to be able to install via steam, you can’t undercut steam itself.

I did too but when I had a quick search around that’s what I found. I think it’d be reasonable to apply steam keys, valve is providing the full service there.

I did too but when I had a quick search around that’s what I found.

Source.

It’s the crux of the law suit? They are claiming that valve are applying it to non-steam key games. I think this is their website steamyouoweus.co.uk/faqs/

These price parity clauses apply to all games listed on Steam, not only those distributed via Steam Keys. As a result, other platforms cannot offer better deals, limiting consumer choice and keeping prices higher across the board. This harms competition in the market and stops other platforms from improving their services.

Though I do think the last part is nonsense.

It also says it in the article, though I suppose it is less clear:

The lawsuit - filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London - alleges Valve “forces” game publishers to sign up to conditions which prevents them from selling their titles earlier or for less on rival platforms.

Steam Compensation Claim FAQs | Steam You Owe Us

Find answers to your questions about Steam You Owe Us compensation claims. Visit our FAQs page for helpful information and detailed explanations.

Steam You Owe Us

It’s the crux of the law suit

The plaintiffs making the claim doesn’t make it fact like you’re suggesting. The entire lawsuit is hinging on a single email from years ago. That’s not steady ground.

This is doubly true when you actually look at prices on other storefronts. How was EGS able to have lower prices or even give games away for free when said games were/are available on Steam at the same time?

It is the crux of the lawsuit, I don’t think I suggested anything. The original post is asking what they are on about. I replied with what they are on about.