I’m on the fence whether it’s ai generated or not
Pretty sure the photographer took the photo in situ.

Here’s the relevant Nature article about specimens from the early vertebrate genera Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia (and the corresponding Nature news article).

Full preprint published on ResearchGate. Credit for the image is persistently given to Xiangtong Lei and Sihang Zhang, the first two authors listed on the paper.

Four camera-type eyes in the earliest vertebrates from the Cambrian Period - Nature

Early vertebrates, particularly myllokunmingids, possessed four camera-type eyes (a pair of lateral eyes and pineal and parapineal organs), which indicates that these structures functioned in image formation, in support of the hypothesis that the four camera-type eyes represent an ancestral vertebrate trait.

Nature
. * surprised vertebrate face *
They already look cute - then you look closely and they’re extra cute
Screens internally
They saw things. Terrible, horrible things.

Ay ay ay ay ay!

Just try to fathom what they were seeing, what they were used to…

I don’t know why you are being downvoted.

The general populace is uneducated/dumb, that’s why safeguards are implemented.

I’m all for the idea of freedom, but making the exercise of that freedom informed.

I do onsite IT support, and much of my job is preventing and undoing user fuckups.

How many apps do you need to install per day? How many of those are sideloaded? I think that

If you look into fauna before each major extintion events, things get weirder and weirder, so weird that Hollywood would have a hard time selling a movie with that shit

Stroke or AI?

I don’t know about them but

Heh, neither. Voyager had saved text from an earlier unsent reply, and on the phone it was above the fold, so I didn’t see it.
I wonder how it feels about anglerfish
More eyes = more better