On my way to Munich this morning β€” Deutsche Bahn ICE train canceled without replacement. Couldn’t board the next train bound to Munich (run by another operator - Westbahn), so I stood in the cold for 45mins until the next DB train.
That’s where liberalisation hurts customers: multiple operators, but no cross-honoring when things go wrong. Wouldn’t it make sense to have mutual backup agreements for delays and cancellations? πŸ€” @jon anything in discussions policy wise on this?

@julienmarchal @jon

So it's not the notoriously unreliable 100% state owned DB, that fucked up yet again. It's the relatively tiny private rail company Westbahn. It's impossible for them to buffer all the DB fuckups for free without going bankrupt.

DB also owns the tracks BTW, and therefore controls the costs for the competition. There is no free market, just a bad excuse to enshittify public transport, and have the shortthinkers blame the privatization, that never actually happened.

@cdonat Sorry but that's off. Westbahn did not have to expand to Stuttgart, but did. And can because you can actually get paths on DB InfraGo infra - as Flixtrain and many others do. The central problem is a lack of investment in that infra that blights DB and everyone else, and dates back to the 1990s. @julienmarchal

@jon @julienmarchal

Yes, you can get timeslots on DB infrastructure, but DB controls

1. the price
2. the quality of the infrastructure, and
3. the existence of an infrastructure.

You can only get a timeslot on tracks, that exist. Many smaller towns in Germany, that used to have a train station, don't even have tracks any more.

And on investment, who would have to have invested in that infrastructure? The 100% state owned DB, maybe?

@jon @julienmarchal

The infrastructure should be separated from the train operation. The train operation should be really privatized, i.e. sold. The infrastructure instead should be organized just like the road infrastructure.

Then the state could sell timeslots to anyone, who wants to operate trains.