DuckDuckGo Pushes Back on Forced AI, Asks Users If AI Should Be Optional
DuckDuckGo Pushes Back on Forced AI, Asks Users If AI Should Be Optional
:D
Well. Glad to see I don’t need to bother.
I imagine the cross section of DDG users and people who fucking hate AI is higher than average, but I hope at least that this is somewhat reflective of general public sentiment.
I don’t hate AI as a tool. Especially in narrow, high-impact use-cases.
I work in medicine. I have already seen instances of AI, used as a tool by professionals, helping to literally save lives. The applications in medical research (and many scientific fields probably) are genuinely exciting. AlphaFold won a nobel for a reason. Insanely cool projects like the Human Cell Atlas wouldn’t be possible without it.
The problem is stupid-ass ‘general’ chatbots being forced down everyone’s throats so corpos can hoover up even fucking more of our data and sell more fucking ads.
Even these chatbots can be useful, but I won’t use any that collect data or sell ads.
In this regard I think DDG’s approach is pretty reasonable. You can turn on or off, you can use it without an account, and all queries are anonymized before being sent to the model.
I get that people have a reflexive “fuck AI” reaction because of the way it has been deployed in society. I truly understand it. But honestly that’s more of a capitalism problem than an AI problem. AI is a tool like a hammer. Just because evil corporate pricks are using it to bash our heads in doesn’t mean we should hate hammers, it means we should hate evil corporate pricks.
This is where terminology is an issue. Yes Alpha Fold and Chatgpt are both “AI” but they’re very different technologies underneath. Most people who say “fuck AI” usually just mean the generative AI technologies behind Chatgpt and Sora and such.
The common person doesn’t understand this difference though and probably isn’t even aware of AlphaFold.
It’s a tool. There aren’t any good and bad hammers. Someone using a hammer to build affordable housing is doing a good thing. Someone using a hammer to kill kittens is doing a bad thing. It’s not the fucking hammer’s fault, but it’s also not surprising that if 95% of the people buying hammers are using them to kill kittens and post videos on instagram about it to the point that manufacturers start designing their hammers with specialized kitten-killing features and advertising them for the purpose non-stop, people will get pretty fucking angry at all the stores and peddlers selling these fucking hammers on every street corner.
And that’s where we are with “generative AI” right now. Which is not really AI, by the way, none of this has any “intelligence” of any kind, that’s just a very effective sales tactic for a fundamentally really interesting but currently badly abused technology. It’s all just the world’s largest financial grift. It’s not the technology’s fault.
This.
I am anti generative AI. I am agressively anti generative AI. Years ago I saw someone make an AI to tell if a mole was cancerous or not (the modelin question was flawed because it learned if there is a ruler in the photo there was cancer but that’s not the point). An image model trained exclusively to detect cancer moles vs safe moles is a useful first tool that you could just use your phone for before going in for a real test.