Looking for examples: do you know any open source projects that have updated their contribution process to handle AI-assisted PRs thoughtfully?

Specifically interested in:
* PR templates that ask for intent/reasoning
* Policies around comprehension checks
* Other methods for adding more friction to creating a PR

Would love to learn from communities already experimenting here

@abbycabs Here's the CPython policy: https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/generative-ai/

And here's the recently merged Django PR template now requiring AI assistance disclosure:
https://github.com/django/django/pull/19594

Generative AI

Generative AI tools have evolved rapidly, and their suggested results can be helpful. As with using any tool, the resulting contribution is the responsibility of the contributor. We value good code...

Python Developer's Guide
Mitchell Hashimoto (@[email protected])

Ghostty is getting an updated AI policy. AI assisted PRs are now only allowed for accepted issues. Drive-by AI-written PRs will be closed without question. Bad AI drivers will be banned from all future contributions. If you're going to use AI, you better be good. https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10412

Hachyderm.io

@abbycabs

I assume you saw the JOSS changes, which are related but at the level of the software as a whole rather than the level of a PR?

https://blog.joss.theoj.org/2026/01/preparing-joss-for-a-generative-ai-future

Preparing JOSS for a generative AI future: From code to human creativity and design | Journal of Open Source Software Blog

Blog for the Journal of Open Source Software • <a href='https://joss.theoj.org'>https://joss.theoj.org</a>

@abbycabs The discussion thread from the Linux kernel’s upcoming policy perhaps: https://lore.kernel.org/ksummit/202511[email protected]/
[PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content - Dave Hansen