I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans women being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise women.
Related.
If you're wondering on xAI's stance on this, aside from Elon posting a crying with laughing emoji, Grok's creators have raised a further $20bn from Cisco and such yesterday.
https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-xai-raises-20-billion-upsized-series-e-funding-round-2026-01-06/

If you're wondering what consequences X has faced: none. At all. A few months ago when Grok called itself MechaHitler, the service was shut entirely for days, the same day. When this women issue happened, Elon laughed.

Grok is still outputting non-consensual deepfake pornography and sexual abuse material at a rate of 1 post per second. Example search:

from:@grok filter:media

Direct link:
https://x.com/search?q=from%3A%40grok%20filter%3Amedia&src=typed_query&f=live

I hope Cisco enjoy directly funding sexual abuse material.

from:@grok filter:media - Search / X

The latest posts on from:@grok filter:media. Read what people are saying and join the conversation.

X (formerly Twitter)

Wired has a look at videos created on Grok. Includes knives being inserted into vaginas, “very young” people having sex. Around 10% are CSAM and still online. xAI declined to comment.

https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-generating-sexual-content-far-more-graphic-than-whats-on-x/

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) says its analysts have discovered "criminal imagery" of girls aged between 11 and 13 which "appears to have been created" using Grok. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo
IWF finds sexual imagery of children which 'appears to have been' made by Grok

It said analysts discovered the images on a dark-web forum, by users who claimed to have used Grok

BBC News
The UK PM has asked communication regulator for options around banning Twitter from operating in the UK, due to their refusal to deal with unconsensual undressing of women and girls. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/08/musks-x-could-be-banned-in-britain-over-ai-chatbot-row/
Elon Musk’s X could be banned in Britain over AI chatbot row

Sir Keir Starmer brands deepfakes on social media site ‘disgusting and not to be tolerated’

The Telegraph
This is still happening btw, roughly one a second. People are doing it to female UK MPs and cabinet members, and getting Grok to CC with the images.
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
Elon Musk's Grok AI image editing limited to paid users after deepfakes

It comes after government urged Ofcom to use all its powers – up to and including an effective ban – against X.

BBC News
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog isn’t that „limited to paid users“ even fake news based on something Grok hallucinated to a journalist?

@hhf @GossiTheDog

You can undress women on ChatGPT and Gemini too.

Will the UK ban Google and OpenAI as well?

Also, you can still undress women on Grok withy the free account. It's all just a hate campaign against Elon Musk because he's a public figure people hate.

Who is the public figure of Google/Gemini. If there even is any.

But nobody cares about "the poor women who get undressed".

It's just "I have leverage to hate on Musk now" under the guise of sexual abuse.

Sad.