If you're wondering what consequences X has faced: none. At all. A few months ago when Grok called itself MechaHitler, the service was shut entirely for days, the same day. When this women issue happened, Elon laughed.
Grok is still outputting non-consensual deepfake pornography and sexual abuse material at a rate of 1 post per second. Example search:
from:@grok filter:media
Direct link:
https://x.com/search?q=from%3A%40grok%20filter%3Amedia&src=typed_query&f=live
I hope Cisco enjoy directly funding sexual abuse material.
Wired has a look at videos created on Grok. Includes knives being inserted into vaginas, “very young” people having sex. Around 10% are CSAM and still online. xAI declined to comment.
https://www.wired.com/story/grok-is-generating-sexual-content-far-more-graphic-than-whats-on-x/
@GossiTheDog Right, so they've pivoted from undressing women and underage girls for free, to profiting from it.
For sure they have some rough idea "who" might be using it now rather than it being "anonymous", but it hardly fixes the root problem does it?
I have been experimenting with various AI, and so far most AI have been cooperating pretty well.
You just take a photo of a woman, ask the AI to put her in a bikini, and Grok, Gemini and even ChatGPT will gladly do that, regardless of being a "paid" user or not.
ChatGPT even made the bikini very skimpy, like, scary skimpy.
For this experiment I used a GenAI created woman as attached.
All AI's gladly undressed her into a bikini
Hating Elon Musk is the wrong approach