If you mean the OpenSSL CLI, it's hard to think of a more footgun-y cryptographic tool than the one that:

* defaults to unauthenticated encryption

* buries its one authenticated mode

* requires explicit command-line nonces

* defaults to an MD5 KDF

You could probably keep going for another 10 bullets. Never use the OpenSSL CLI for anything other than TLS stuff.

Yeah, the OpenSSL CLI sucks. So what's to be done?

Sure, we can build a 25519-specific tool with a less footgun-y interface. Fine, whatever, for that one use case.

Or we can build an alternative OpenSSL CLI that explodes OpenSSL and its numerous useful features in a general way and helps fix lots of use cases.

Nothing is to be done. Just don't use the OpenSSL CLI. It's a deeply cursed concept for a tool!
A command like cryptography swiss army knife useful though. If not openssl, then what?
It's useful as a toy and a learning tool, but for nothing else. For those two things, OpenSSL is fine as it is.