CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them?

https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/828353

CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them? - Lemmy: Bestiverse

Comments [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46415488]

Paywalled but overall I’ve come to the conclusion that executive pay isn’t as insane as it seems. Like yeah okay there are outliers that are insane, but it’s actually a super difficult role to hire for, and certainly not a role AI can replace soon. It involves:

  • high levels of creativity
  • good taste and sound judgement
  • a ton of politics and emotional intelligence
  • mental stability and reliability
  • a lot of intangible skills that are hard to survey
  • connections & networking
  • often unique and original views of the world
  • organizational skills and high level problem solving

These aren’t skills to be taken lightly and they take years to develop, to be a good manager & bear responsibility for the lives of many employees. If AI made proposals, someone still has to actually judge which ideas to pursue, so you can’t really get rid of the job. Maybe you could reduce the amount of executives. But when a company has leadership that’s actually coherent and works, employees like them, it’s a goldmine that needs to be protected by the owners

CEOs used to make as much as 20-30 times the average worker in the 60s-70s to now 280-290 times the average worker. Do you think that CEOs have gotten 10 times more valuable that the average worker despite the average worker’s productivity increasing 74% over that same period? Adjusted for inflation, from 1972 to 2022, average worker salary increased only 12 cents. They’ve been stagnant for 50 years. Only in 2023 was there any significant gains for the average worker (4%) but CEO pay continues to increase multiplicatively, not fractionally. CEO pay is just another bubble, an empty arms race. They’re not worth nearly what they’re paid.