‘Avatar: Fire And Ash’ Sparking To $340M-$350M Global Opening – International Box Office
‘Avatar: Fire And Ash’ Sparking To $340M-$350M Global Opening – International Box Office
James Cameron said if this one doesn’t make much money he would be okay to walk away.
Guess there will be “avatar 4 from root to dust” or some other shit to do with the fourth element (pretty sure the first one was air).
There are 6 billion people in the world.
Ok… you do get how relatively tiny your circle of friends is. Everyone you times 1000 is fractional amount compared just to the population of your country.
The movie made 340 million because the franchise is beloved. I know that shocks the Reddit/Lemmy hive mind that is convinced the movies have no cultural significance.
I went to go see it. Wicked and this are the only movies I saw in the theater. It was great fun.
There’s a decent chunk of people that watch them solely for the bleeding edge CGI technology.
Others that like those kinds of stories. Nothing in the story is unique. Avatar, Pocahontas, Dances With Wolves, and numerous others are all fundamentally the same story told in different ways. There’s a reason these stories keep being told and people still like watching them.
This is me, I went along when invited by friends to see the graphics.
This one wasn’t worth it, there’s been no advancement since 2. And since most of the filming has been done for 4 and 5 already, I’m not expecting them to show any technology growth either.
I saw it in a Dolby theater rather than IMAX. I don’t think IMAX would have made enough difference to change my mind.
Right?
I can understand the first sequel hype, but it was kinda lame and I just dont see how people are bothering to see the next.
After the first dune, the sequel premier in my town had a whopping total of 13 people show up to watch.
I feel like Avengers normalized multi film continiuity, and people only feel compelled to show up like brand loyalty to a story/franchise.
Which is dumb because most if not all of these franchise films usually have no significant input from the original talent. James Cameron literally showed up to collect a pay check and go home.
I mean then again, people pay for FIFA and NBA2K every year so its not like it’s far fetched. But cmon, this is why these media products dont get as heavily criticized compared to genuinely superior alternatives.
I went to see the second one purely because I wanted to see the cinematography, I didn’t expect too much from the plot. No disappointment there.
I may yet do the same with the third one. I’m also not expecting too much from the plot there. I just want to see cool cinematography and fancy world-building. It’s entertaining in its own way and best seen on the big screen.
It’s not the people who see it once out of curiosity that cause these huge numbers.
It’s the people who see it three times in one week.
Something I’ve never really understood about the Avatar movies, derivative plot, poor script and tedious length aside - is the CGI meant to look real? Are we meant to watch these and think this could have been filmed on a real alien planet?
I remember the fuss when the first one came along over how amazing the visuals were. And they are impressive but I’ve always thought of them as very pretty animated movies and at no point thought anything looked photorealistic.
Everything except the visuals and the sound is cheap binding to hold the visuals and sound together.
If you look at us a showcase for some of the best digital art ever created rather than a movie that needs to have a great plot, acting, or any kind of real emotional impact, then you can see it for what it is.
The movies are absolutely beautiful, and an absolute spectacle of what is possible, but that’s all they are.