Every time there's news from Mozilla we see a lot of takes around here along the lines of: they're clueless, their heads are in the sand, they don't know their userbase.

Alternative interpretation: We're looking at another case very much like Bluesky - a corporation with somewhat-openwashed branding which knows exactly who their userbase is, hates it, and wants a different one.

The rationale is clear enough; the browser is just a massive opportunity for datamining. The "AI" startups can only dream of controlling a browser with even the marketshare of Firefox. In that light, it's no use having a userbase of technically competent, privacy-aware dissidents who can work around the extractive dark patterns. Let's face it people, we're not profitable to surveillance capitalism

@ophiocephalic And defending this abomination in Firefox means we're just useful idiots marketing the browser to the new audience.
@yoasif
That could well be argued

Yep. Over the holidays I'm going to shift to either Librewolf or Vivaldi as my daily driver. To be honest, it's long overdue, but it still pains me.

@ophiocephalic @yoasif

@thenexusofprivacy
You should find Librewolf to feel quite familiar if you haven't used it much yet

@yoasif

@ophiocephalic @thenexusofprivacy And Vivaldi is both ugly (opinion) and closed source.
@yoasif @ophiocephalic @thenexusofprivacy also it's just a #Chromium - #Fork thus subject to the same #Enshittification with #ManifestV3...