VogiDec 12

Red Hat pushing AI

https://piefed.social/c/fuck_ai/p/1562919/red-hat-pushing-ai

Red Hat pushing AI

Users points out in comments how the LLM recommends APT on Fedora which is clearly wrong. I can't tell if OP is responding with LLM as well–it woul…

Show threadAA5BDec 13

Seems like everyone taking a left turn into crazy ville ……

This is a good approach.

  • It’s an mcp server, a “bridge”. A standard way LLMs could talk to your system. It’s not an LLM. It doesnt mandate an LLM. It doesn’t tie you to a specific LLM

  • It’s optional. Don’t use it, or don’t install it. No harm done. Even if it’s installed and running, if you don’t use an LLM with local access, no harm done.

  • Even the increased attack surface is not a big deal since it is local, optional, and focuses on reading statuses rather than executing actions

  • It’s an open standard. If you decide to use it with an LLM but don’t like the results, try a different LLM

    • Show threadFinalsolo963

    Yeah, most people, myself included, don’t like AI on principle, but there are valid use cases for it, and not having the capability of integrating with AI tools is going to be a dealbreaker for someone.

    That said, I’ve heard MCP is a bit of a shitshow of a standard and is woefully inefficient.

    Dec 13 at 7:40pmWeb
    Show threadAA5BDec 14
    Yeah it is. I have no idea how you more efficiently do that task, but there’s got to be a better way