Jolla has spent years disparaging projects based on the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) for marketing. SailfishOS has a largely closed source user interface and application layer with no equivalent to the open source AOSP. It's far less private and secure than AOSP or iOS too.
Jolla recently launched a new product so their supporters are understandably trying to promote it. As part of that, they've been posting about it in replies to posts about GrapheneOS. We've replied to some of it with our perspective within threads originally about GrapheneOS.

Since we dared to post accurate information in threads about GrapheneOS where they mentioned us in replies to promote it, their forum is being used as a place to attack GrapheneOS including libelous attacks towards our team referencing harassment content:

https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/sailfish-os-clarifying-claims-about-open-closed-source-security-and-privacy/25933

Sailfish OS: Clarifying claims about open/closed source, security and privacy

Actually Jolla say that “Sailfish OS is partially open source, but not fully open source in the sense of “every part of the OS is free/open-source.” After digging deeper and discussing I found GrapheneOS comments: Jolla is a for-profit company misleading people about what they providing. Their OS has extraordinarily poor privacy and security compared to the Android Open Source Project or iOS. Their own OS code is mostly closed source and there isn’t an open source subset that’s usable. Jolla ...

Sailfish OS Forum
@GrapheneOS And when I used it, on a Planet Gemini and a Sony Xperia phone, a person in the US needed to use a VPN to buy a full version because they wouldn't sell to American customers. At that time, Jolla was largely owned by or had significant investors in Russia, which raised eyebrows. I stopped using it for those reasons, that the Sony battery swelled up and there was not an economical replacement, that I got real Linux working reliably on the Gemini, and because Sailfish kinda sucked.