Story of the week: NASA spacecraft had a serious software vulnerability sitting there for 3 years. Humans missed it. An AI-based code analysis tool helped find and fix it in 4 days.
This is the tension we’re living in:
– AI will be used to attack systems faster.
– We need AI to help defend and audit them faster too.
The goal isn’t “AI good/AI bad” — it’s: who points these tools at what, and with which values?
"AI morally ambiguous" because it's a tool and not a person, thus cannot be measured by the same values you measure a fellow human by.
you would not judge hammers poorly because sometimes they're used to murder people, so why would you do so for AI?
@loganer I agree AI is a tool, not a person.
But not all tools are equal.
A hammer is:
– Simple / Transparent / Local in impact
Modern AI systems are:
– Complex / opaque (even to creators)
– Scaled across millions of people
– Shaping information, decisions, and incentives
So the moral weight lives not “in the AI” as a soul, but in:
– The data it’s trained on
– The objectives it’s optimized for
– The institutions and power structures deploying it
optimization for specific tasks would be down to the individual model though, the same can apply to hammers.
there are certainly many different kinds of hammer, after all.
THE * HIDDEN * NODE
👽🐦🦇🐉💻