The bit I don't get about AI art is that what I chase after in my own work is the *doing*.
Finding a -flow- where I can kind of see a thing in my head, start working towards it, and it changes continuously as I tell myself a narrative behind what I'm making.
AI art is like instead of going out for an evening with friends, talking, and a great meal followed by dessert then lazing about in a park swearing at bats - you press a button and suddenly you're so full you could burst and have rabies.
@NanoRaptor The result of AI is not art. It is an approximation of art. It's what the AI thinks it's art. At best it can only guess; at worst, it creates a clusterfuck.
And even at best, it still gets it wrong.
Because AI is not human.
For art to be art, it must need a human factor. And only a human can do that.
A human can use AI, but ultimately it will not be art. Because you can't truly say it's yours.
Because the materials the AI uses isn't yours.
The style isn't yours.
The method isn't yours.
AI art is like taking a sleeping aid, going to bed, and suddenly waking up in a room full of 'shrooms and permanent ink all over you. And whales in the sky. Odd-numbered clocks.
A clusterfuck. At best.
Nanoraptor
Miko Blissful [he/fae]