Trains cancelled over fake bridge collapse image

https://feddit.org/post/22626489

Trains cancelled over fake bridge collapse image - feddit.org

Lemmy

A BBC journalist ran the image through an AI chatbot which identified key spots that may have been manipulated.

What the actual fuck? You couldn’t spare someone to just go look at the fucking thing rather than asking ChatGPT to spin you a tale? What are we even doing here, BBC?

A photo taken by a BBC North West Tonight reporter showed the bridge is undamaged

So they did. Why are we talking about ChatGPT then? You could just leave that part out. It’s useless. Obviously a fake photo has been manipulated. Why bother asking?

I tried the image of this real actual road collapse: www.tv2.no/nyheter/innenriks/…/12875776

I told ChatGPT it was fake and asked it to explain why. It assured me I was a special boy asking valid questions and helpfully made up some claims.

60 mennesker isolert etter veiras

Rundt 60 personer er isolert etter at elleve meter av fylkesvei 391 raste ut i Dalsfjorden mellom Hestad og Laukeland i Gaular lørdag morgen.

TV 2

Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

There’s a massive difference between asking if something is fake and telling it it is, and asking why.

A person would make the same type of guesses and explanations.

All this is showing is, you and ALOT of other people just don’t know enough about AI to be able to have a conversation about it.

A person would have the agency to ask, " why do you think it’s fake?”

Why would it have to? It knows to do any task put in front of it.

A human would to.

When people use a conversational tool, they expect it to act human, which it INTENTIONALLY DOES but without the sanity of a real human.
It’s not a conversation tool when you present it with a specific task….
When we are talking about LLM chat bots, they have a conversational interface. I am not talking about other types of machine learning. I don’t have time to keep responding.

. I am not talking about other types of machine learning.

Then you are making up you own conversation instead of following the thread?

The person presented a specific task to an AI, where does a chatbot come in?

They are asking chatgpt.

Seriously? A chatbot is one function of an ai, not the other way around. So when you give the ai a different ask or set of instructions, it’s no longer the chatbot anymore, it’s whatever function that’s needed for that task.

I weep for humanity if you’re any indication of the general education on ai….

Please see my above comments.

I don’t know what AI is, but I’m going to talk like I’m an expert.

Yes I’ve already addressed your asinine view.