Ethical consumption, 1860
Ethical consumption, 1860
You are using technology. Technology uses lithium and cobalt from conflict zones and areas using slave labor.
You are a hypocrit.
No moral consumption means that it’s impossible to interact with this society without supporting some awful shit. It doesn’t mean do whatever lol doesn’t matter haha
Owning slaves wouldn’t count. That’s pretty direct harm.
The better analogy would be a 19th C American using products derived from cotton picked by slaves
Or the other way round, in the modern day the slave owners are the owners of the cobalt mines or whatever
I have said for years, the argument “vote with your wallets, folks!” is bad because:
“Hey if you don’t like slavery, just don’t buy slaves! Then everyone gets what they want.”
Also in GB, it got the common man the right to vote at the same time, since they were fighting WWI at the time and the parliament couldn’t really argue against it anymore.
Lesson: angry women get what they want.
/s
Historical usage of the guillotine mostly targeted nobles who were in the way of the bourgeoisie, leftist revolutionaries, and proletarian criminals.
As much as we romanticize the guillotine, strikes, sabotages, and bricks are the tools of the working class. They have a pretty good track record.
Although I can’t lie, I always smile when protesters bring out a mini guillotine and the ruling class media starts panicking :)
This perfectly describes how YES, these systemic issues will never ever ever change until there are systemic changes.
Legal chattel slavery ended in the US because of systemic changes.
The same types of systemic changes is what will actually work with other trends today that we shame individuals about instead of forcing systemic changes.