Has there ever been a viable alternative to the phsycialist model of the universe?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/51010068

Has there ever been a viable alternative to the phsycialist model of the universe? - sh.itjust.works

Physicalism or materialism. The idea that everything there is arises from physical matter. If true would mean there is no God or Free Will, no immortal soul either. Seems to be what most of academia bases their world view on and the frame work in which most Science is done. Often challenged by Dualism and Idealism but only by a loud fringe minority. I’ve heard pan-psychicism is proving quite the challenge, but I hear that from people who believe crystals can cure autism I hear that “Oh actually the science is moving away from materialism” as well, but that seems to be more crystal talk as well. So lemme ask science instead of google. Any reason to doubt physicalism? Is there anything in science that says “Huh well that seems to not have any basis in the physical at all and yet it exists”

So the thing is, like other commenters have said, you’re asking metaphysics things through the prism of science, which does not work because by nature, science uses the (mostly) objective scientific method, while metaphysics is based on subjective assessments.

You have to separate the physical, material universe as being in the domain of what can be known, from the rest, which can not be, and never will. This does not mean it doesn’t exist, just that it can never be studied or proved in any way, so anyone can believe what they wish about it without leaving rationality (as long as the belief does not imply things concerning the material universe)