[Opinion] AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles

https://blackneon.net/post/72051

How could you do this to me? - BlackNeon.net

> For one month beginning on October 5, I ran an experiment: Every day, I asked ChatGPT 5 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT_5] (more precisely, its “Extended Thinking” version) to find an error in “Today’s featured article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About_Today%27s_featured_article]”. In 28 of these 31 featured articles (90%), ChatGPT identified what I considered a valid error, often several. I have so far corrected 35 such errors.

legitimate use of a LLM
“AI” summed up. 95% of the time it’s pointless bullshit being shoehorned into absolutely everything. 5% of the time it can be useful.
like Comic Sans
Something weird about corporations spending billions on “the Comic Sans of technology”