Taggart Nov 15
Mozilla vs. their core audience
Show threadSerge DrozNov 17

@mttaggart I disagree here. A lot of people want and use AI and I personally find it useful for some things but not others.

Mozilla, as opposed to others claims to make this a voluntary thing. That's the way to go, give people a choice, not force them either way.

If the only choice is AI forced down your throat or no AI at all, most folks will choose the former.

The world is not black and white, although, it seems we increasingly go absolute.

Show threadTaggart Nov 17
@sergedroz People already had a choice in Firefox without adding features that, as this post suggests, are by no means popular with Firefox's core user base. Nothing stopped Firefox users from using those tools if they wanted. Moves like "AI Mode" represent a conscious choice to favor these toxic technologies over other possible uses of Mozilla's time and treasure.
Show threadSerge DrozNov 17
@mttaggart this one: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-window/. Seems ok to me, giving ordinary people a choice
Introducing AI, the Firefox way: A look at what we're working on and how you can help shape it | The Mozilla Blog

We recently shared how we are approaching AI in Firefox — with user choice and openness as our guiding principles. That’s because we believe AI should

Show threadParigot-Manchot
@sergedroz @mttaggart Where is the choice when AI is here even if you don't want ?
Thanks to Mozilla, I'm investigating a Chromium-like alternative like @Vivaldi , even if adding extensions on mobile version is not here.
Thanks a lot Merdzilla (french slang term meaning Shitzilla).
Nov 22 at 8:25amWeb