Matt ElliottAfter a quick debate, Councillor Paula Fletcher's motion asking Metrolinx to provide GPS tracking for all trucks working on the Ontario Line and better communication with residents CARRIES 25-0. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.EX27.3
Up now: the City would like to close a gap on the Humber Trail, but the path winds through the Weston Golf Club. The golf club is not happy about this. They submitted this graphic showing the path of the trail and 1954 flood damage caused by Hurricane Hazel. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.GG25.15
Councillor Burnside doesn't really want to hear any more about this golf club stuff. He calls the question, moving to skip the rest of the speakers and proceed straight to the vote. That FAILS 14-9. It needed two-thirds. The golf talk continues.
On the Humber Trail / Golf Course item, Councillor Holyday moves for a report on an "alternate design" for the trail that would go around the golf course property.
After several councillors argue that this trail design was already approved years ago, Holyday's motion to look at an alternative alignment for the Humber Trail past the Weston Golf Club FAILS 4-21.
Council votes 22-3 to APPROVE the plan to continue negotiations with the Weston Golf Club re: acquiring land for the Humber Trail, with authorization to initiate expropriations if necessary.
Up now: on the speed camera item, Mayor Olivia Chow has a motion requesting Premier Doug Ford cover the cost of programs that were previously funded by speed camera revenue, including the crossing guard program and the salaries of 18 police officers. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.IE25.8
"Starting tomorrow, 1,000 people could lose their jobs," says Mayor Olivia Chow, including over 900 crossing guards, because the city won't be able to collect revenue from speed cameras after a provincial bill banning them. The ban also takes money away from capital projects like traffic calming.
Chow's motion requesting the province cover the full cost of crossing guards, police officers, and road safety improvements previously paid for by speed camera revenue CARRIES 25-0.
Up now: starting Jan 1, your recycling will be collected by a private company, not the City of Toronto. Council is pretty concerned that the new company, Circular Materials, is not ready for this transition. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.IE25.2
Fletcher's motion on the blue bins isn't ready yet, so council jumps over to an item about the Allen & Eglinton intersection. Councillor Bradford wants to give a speech about the importance of fixing the design of the intersection to relieve traffic congestion. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.IE25.6
Councillor Mike Colle laments the traffic at the Eglinton & Allen intersection, but says there's no quick fix.
"And you know what's going to exasperate it even more? The lunatic provincial government is going to allow 30 towers of condominiums along the Allen Road!"
Jumping back to the blue bins, Councillor Fletcher passes a motion asking the new company collecting recycling provide some extra trucks to handle the extra cardboard & such produced over the holidays.
"Fasten your seatbelts, colleagues, because I think it's going to be a rough ride," she adds.
Council nearly loses quorum during a debate about whether they should ask people to refrain from using two-stroke gas-powered lawn equipment like leaf blowers during days with poor air quality. I can't imagine why. It's thrilling stuff. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.IE25.13
On the lawn equipment item, Councillor Stephen Holyday moves to replace the word "possible" in this motion with "practical and feasible." Sometimes you just gotta use a leaf blower, even on high AQHI days, he explains.
Up now: Councillor Brad Bradford's motion to amend the encampment policy to prioritize the removal of camps close to schools, daycares and playgrounds within 48 hours. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.MM34.4
Bradford asks how many encampments there are currently. Staff say there are 355. 255 are located in 92 parks. 199 of them are located within 200 metres of a school, playground or daycare — about 56% of the total.
Bradford asks if the new encampment policy adopted in 2024 led to more encampments or fewer. Staff say a year ago there were 540 encampments. Today, there are 355.
"The motion as-is would not be operationally feasible for us to remove 199 encampments within 48 hours," says GM of Shelters Gord Tanner of the Bradford motion.
Perks asks the City Solicitor if she sees any issues with Bradford's motion. She does! She says the motion may run afoul of rules preventing council from directing enforcement, and could be inconsistent with a court's ruling in Waterloo Region re: encampments.
"Do we currently have enough space in our [shelter] system for everyone who is in an encampment to go?" Perks asks Shelters GM Gord Tanner.
"No," says Tanner.
"I think that's all I needed to hear," says Perks.
Councillor Lily Cheng asks if the city has ever considered establishing an area where people can legally set up encampments.
Tanner says the city has thought about it, but given how hard it's been to find shelter sites, finding land for a legal encampment area would be very tough.
Fletcher's motion would also apply a three-strikes rule: people living in encampments would be offered shelter a maximum of three times before the removal process begins.
With 15 items left on the agenda, Councillor Gord Perks moves to finish the agenda tonight. Motion to extend CARRIES 15-7.
Councillor Gord Perks wants to jump over to the TPA Board item, because he says it needs to be dealt with ASAP. But councillors Bradford and Pasternak don't want to do that. Procedural confusion! Anyway, the vote to reorder the agenda FAILS 10-10. And so chaos reigns.
Back to encampments. Councillor Chris Moise says the city's current encampment strategy is working. "In August 2025, for the first time in Toronto Centre, we had no encampments in all of our parks," he says.
"I am voting against this motion because I think it's BS," says Moise of Bradford's encampment motion. "And I just hope that somebody here will come to their senses."
"I am the father of a two- and a four-year-old. And I don't think parents should have to worry about whether it's safe or not to take their kids to the park or walk to school," says Councillor Brad Bradford.
Bradford says Fletcher's motion is a "poison pill." He says the mayor has allowed parks to be "overrun for months on end."
"Dufferin Grove used to be the example of how we had a compassionate response... that was the model. Now Dufferin Grove is the nightmare."
Pasternak moves to call the question, ending this encampment debate. That FAILS 6-14. The debate will continue until morale improves.
Councillor Gord Perks calls Bradford's speech "performative."
"Isn't it interesting that the same person who gets up and thumps the table and talks about all the harms caused by people who have lost their homes, being in encampments, has voted against building shelters," Perks says.
"You cannot in good faith stand up on Monday and say, 'Stop building shelters!' And then stand up on Thursday and say, 'Get everybody out of the encampments.' It is REPREHENSIBLE to do that," says Councillor Gord Perks of Brad Bradford's motion.
Council takes a break from the encampments item. Council is now considering a motion from Councillor James Pasternak to support an MZO that'd greatly limit the amount of housing that can be built next to a vaccine manufacturing facility on Steeles Ave. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.MM34.11
Staff confirm Sanofi Pasteur, the owner of the vaccine facility, are particularly concerned about "overlook" and "corporate security." They fear if housing is built nearby, people will be able to peer over their balconies and learn trade secrets.
"Bringing an MZO forward so they can actually NOT create housing. In a housing crisis! I don't get it," says Councillor Chris Moise. He says the Sanofi plant has blacked-out windows so he doesn't buy their arguments re: trade secrets and privacy.
"Let the provincial government decide if they want to have an MZO and quash this housing. But we, as a council, should not aid them and abet them in doing so. And this is why I am voting against this. This is a FARCE," says Moise of the Sanofi MZO.
"There's widespread documentation that if this development is approved, it will dramatically compromise and impair the ability of Sanofi to do [life-saving] work," says Pasternak, the local rep. He says the proposal adjacent to the site only offers 12 new affordable units. "Not a housing bonanza."
Pasternak says if residents are allowed to move into a development next to this vaccine plant, "they will complain about noise, they will complain about odour." He says these complaints will trigger a slowdown in work at the plants.
Councillor Pasternak's motion to support an MZO restricting housing development on Steeles next to the Sanofi facility CARRIES 19-2. (That's Matlow and Moise opposed.)
Councillor Brad Bradford's motion to prioritize encampment removals based on those with the most significant impact within 150 metres of schools, daycares and playgrounds FAILS 9-10.
Councillor Fletcher's motion to prioritize encampment removals for those having a significant impact within 50 metres of a school, daycare, or playground, and to make a max of three offers of shelter, CARRIES 14-5.
Up now: Councillor Bravo's motion to oppose the parts of Bill 60 that further limit city hall's ability to redesign roads. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.MM34.14
Holyday says he can't support the Bravo motion. He says city hall brought this on themselves.
"Clearly we've been offside so many times with what the broad majority of many of these neighbourhoods expect of us. And I think that's what prompted this."
Bravo's motion to oppose the part of Bill 60 further restricting Toronto's ability to redesign roads CARRIES 14-1.
Just two items left. Up now: Mayor Olivia Chow's motion to dissolve the Toronto Parking Authority Board and "conduct a thorough operational review." Bradford wants to ask questions of the mayor, but she's not here. He doesn't love that. https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.MM34.17
"What is the problem that has been discovered that requires the immediate dissolving of the board?" Councillor Myers asks.
City Manager Paul Johnson says the mayor is in charge of the budget, and she's looking for efficiencies.
Councillor Holyday wants to know if council can summon TPA management and the current TPA board to this meeting at this hour. Councillor Paula Fletcher, serving as speaker, doesn't think that's doable. "I don't think they're gonna be here," she says.
"Everybody is a little hungry and a little hangry," says Fletcher. She and Nunziata decide to take a ten-minute recess so councillors can eat. Weird vibes.
Council is back, finally. Holyday wants to know if reps for the Toronto Parking Authority are here now. Nunziata says no.
"We didn't invite them," she says.
"So where are they?" Holyday asks.
"They're not here," says Nunziata.
It goes on like this for a while.
Mayor Chow is back in the chamber. Bradford asks if he can get another five minutes to ask questions of the mayor, now that she's back. Nunziata says no. Bradford challenges that ruling. Chair is UPHELD, 14-5.
Bradford moves to delay the dissolution of the TPA Board to next month's meeting. He says he has a lot of questions that need answering, and an extra month would help.
If that fails, he's got a motion to NOT dissolve the TPA Board, and instead leave it in place for the governance review.
Councillor Brad Bradford accuses Chow of trying to dissolve the TPA Board "under the cover of darkness" and says she is not being honest about her reasons for doing this.
"You should be very honest and stop grandstanding," shoots back Nunziata.
Bradford says the way Nunziata has been running this meeting is an "affront on the democratic process in this chamber."
Of the TPA change, he says he thinks this is actually about installing new leadership, like happened with the TTC.
Councillor Fletcher moves to strike part of the mayor's motion that would have appointed herself and Nunziata to the new TPA Board as non-voting members. She says it's not necessary. New board will be purely made up of senior staff.
Nunziata says as a TPA board member, she's seen a lot of opportunities for efficiencies. She notes TPA has their own IT department and other duplicative departments.
"I believe we can get more revenue. That we should get more revenue," she says.
Mayor Olivia Chow is up to explain why she wants to get rid of the TPA Board. She says TPA's parking lots are city assets., and they could be raising more funds.
She notes the 2026 city budget is a tough one. "We have to find money."
Chow says TPA could find efficiencies in areas like insurance, technology, cyber security, and procurement if they were more integrated with city operations.
"There's nothing underhanded here," she says. Just wants to look at consolidated operations.
Bradford now gets a chance to question the mayor, since she spoke. Under questioning, she notes Chair of the current TPA Board Hartley Lefton resigned this morning, but she says it's completely unrelated to this motion.
Councillor Burnside asks Chow if she's potentially interested in bringing the TTC in-house as a city department, too. She says no. She thinks the current model works well for the TTC.