Girl, 13, expelled for hitting classmate who made a deepfake porn image of her, lawyers say

Girl, 13, expelled for hitting classmate who made a deepfake...

https://kbin.melroy.org/m/[email protected]orld/t/1314837

Log in - MelroyBin

Creator of Mbin: content aggregator and micro-blogging platform for the fediverse

Whooole lotta people in these comments defending the guy who produced and shared Child Exploitation Material. “She shouldn’t have resorted to violence, there were other options” “She shouldn’t have responded to bullying with physical assault” My favourite: “it was made with AI, so it’s not really child porn”

Why is a 13 year old girl being asked to act with the calm sensibility of an adult in this situation, but no one is asking why a 13 year old boy thought it was okay to sexually harass his classmate? If she should have known better, he bloody should have too.

While I agree that jumping to violence can sometimes be the wrong answer, there are at least two cases where you just gotta remind people that polite society has its limits: nazis, and people who are actively sexually assaulting a child. This person was openly sharing sexually explicit material of her with others in front of her. That is sexual assault under Louisiana law. And if you think asking a predator nicely to please stop ever works, you’re a naive fool.

I don’t blame that girl one bit for hitting him. In fact, I hope she used her nails. Some people simply have no sense of boundaries until they receive percussive instruction.

Violence isn’t the answer to trolling.

I hope this girl gets better influences that can show her right from wrong and how to be the bigger person. Her reaction would not fly in the real world.

Edit for the downvoters: This is why, for good reason, none of you are in a position to make decisions that matter.

Violence is the solution to child porn though
I hope you’re not implying that AI generated videos of minors is anywhere near as bad as actual children getting raped.
You are bullding a straw man so you can knock it down. Quit minimizing the harm done by creating sexually explicit images of a minor.

Not really. He’s the one who said “child porn,” which most people would assume to mean children being raped and recorded.

If he’s trying to argue that “making sexually explicit AI videos of minors” deserves a violent response, then he is incorrect and he knows it.

That’s why he tried to conflate the two.

If he’s trying to argue that “making sexually explicit AI videos of minors” deserves a violent response, then he is incorrect and he knows it.

That was what was stated and also seems to be agreed is the correct response to child porn sorry “sexualy explicit AI videos of minors”.