rigol pros: fully functional, native-speed remote desktop (scopetop?) in the browser

rigol cons: whatever the fuck this shit is

@whitequark *shudders in microsoft.xmlhttp*
@whitequark flashback of my salarywo/man years shipping a html5 corpo project by employing "chrome frame" for IE, which felt like divine intervention at that time
@whitequark I was about to go “haha hw people doing sw as per usual”, but then it’s not a webpack-babel-grungle slop as would’ve been done by “sw people” so eh why not, throw flashsocket in there as well why don’t they
@maxbarnash it literally has babel and webpack on the fucking scope
@whitequark i guess that polyfill + code not being minimised was enough to give me hope. Not smart on my part.
@maxbarnash the babel is in a different file. i don't ... really understand wtf it's doing there
not pretty but that’s what it takes to enable the websocket support in IE5
@whitequark an older code, but it checks out
@whitequark the gold in your special serial plate is a remnant of ancient dying neutron stars, cast adrift through the primordial universe. This is another.