Lady Laura 
Amy Worrall@cmconseils only problem there is that employers would think they have much more of a say over where you live.
YourShadowDaniNah, they hired your ass knowing you were an hour away they should pay for that 2 hour trip every day.
Passwordsarehard4@YourShadowDani @amyworrall @cmconseils yeah, that’s why they won’t hire them to begin with. Residency isn’t a protected class, they would fire them if they currently work there as well.
@passwordsarehard4 @amyworrall @cmconseils
The laws can be changed, but it's got to start with actually pushing to change them and not being defeatist.
@YourShadowDani @amyworrall @cmconseils I just don’t think it’s a good idea. If the employee knew what the pay was and where the job was located I don’t see why it would change if they moved? If a person moves out in the country for cheaper rent they also get a pay raise, that’s crazy talk.
@passwordsarehard4 @amyworrall @cmconseils I think housing should also just be free, so it's not crazy talk to me it sounds sensible. In Capitalist hellscapes they could fire the employee if they are costing them too much in transport fees due to right to work laws so I don't see your issue. Moving has a risk of losing jobs now so it's not like anything would change.
@YourShadowDani @amyworrall @cmconseils I don’t follow the last bit, how does moving risk you losing a job? Unless you are a cop or something that has residency requirements I can’t think of why that would work.