@rbreich

First we need a larger Supreme Court.

@kevinrns @rbreich No. We need term limits.

@mlanger @rbreich

No, the need is to appoint 8 more people to the Supreme Court.

Its been 6, 7, 8, 9,10, and FDR wanted 14. How many Justices there are isnt in the Constitution. Its set by Congress.

Corruption of the Courts is collapse.

@kevinrns @rbreich I don’t think MORE supreme court justices will make the matter any better if they are political appointees and can stay in their jobs until they literally drop dead.

@mlanger @rbreich

The problem in the court is not old men, the problem in the Court is corruption.

Four appointees LIED during Constitutionally Mandated Vetting, to Congress.

One other has received millions from billionaires. They conspired. Against us.

A corrupt conspiracy.

An ongoing corrupt conspiracy.

That's problem one.

#scotus #shame #vergogna

@kevinrns @rbreich I didn't say anything about age. Or gender. Or race.

I just said term limits. 12 years. It doesn't matter how old they are when they get in. Even corruption can be fought with term limits. 12 years and they're out.

I don't understand why you want to add more people to that body. If they're just as corrupt as the other ones, does it really matter?

@mlanger @rbreich

The body isnt corrupt, five people are.

Its billionaire corruption. Its anti democracy advocates.

Its a right wing distraction to respond to corruption and bad policy with pointless "term limits" its older than Nixon, and produced the present day GOP.

Term limits is a designed distraction.

@kevinrns @mlanger @rbreich I honestly think it should be "one is chosen every four (or two) years, retirements are not replaced". It doesn't need to be a fixed number, and it doesn't have to be odd. Every POTUS term should get exactly the same number as every other POTUS term.

@AeonCypher @mlanger @rbreich

Scotus Justices have numbered 6, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and America's greatest President wanted 15. The number of Justices is not in the Constitution, it's set by Congress.