Tired: Jurisdiction by shopping cart. Wired: Jurisdiction by WhatsApp(??) Hublot SA v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Docket No. 1:25-cv-09722 (N.D. Ill.) #ScheduleA (ECF 11 is still under seal so we can't see the plaintiff's cited evidence.)
In NBA Properties, the Seventh Circuit found that a #ScheduleA seller was subject to personal jurisdiction in Illinois because it offered the accused product on Amazon *and* sold a single product (to an agent of the plaintiff) into the forum. 46 F.4th 614, 627 (7th Cir. 2022).
So if you do test buys, you're good. But #ScheduleA plaintiffs keep pushing the limit, including in what I refer to as "jurisdiction by shopping cart" scenarios:

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3m3fdtk2lr222
Some NDIL judges have rejected jurisdiction by shopping cart (see, e.g., last post). But not all of them:

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3lwwofje6lc2j
And some local attorneys I know are VERY excited about this recent Second Circuit case:

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3lfruxhney225
Anyway, lots of potential #LawStudentNote ideas here.