US speaker warns of 'one of the longest shutdowns,' says he 'won't negotiate' with Democrats

https://lemmings.world/post/35405595

US speaker warns of 'one of the longest shutdowns,' says he 'won't negotiate' with Democrats - Lemmings.world

Archive link [https://archive.ph/submit/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lemonde.fr%2Fen%2Finternational%2Farticle%2F2025%2F10%2F14%2Fus-speaker-warns-of-one-of-the-longest-shutdowns-says-he-won-t-negotiate-with-democrats-until-they-pause-health-care-demands_6746395_4.html]

Correct me if I’m wrong, but he doesn’t need to negotiate with Democrats. Republicans have the majority and could pass it on their own if it was reasonable.
You are incorrect. Reps hold a majority, but not a supermajority. They would need sixty votes to pass a budget and end the shutdown, and only hold fifty three seats.
Can’t the Senate pass it under the budget reconciliation process with a simple majority?
Yes
…but they only get to use that card once, and they already burned it.
They could also remove the filibuster
How does that get them more votes?
They can then pass this with a simple majority.
I believe there is a limit to the number of times they can use the reconciliation process between doing the current process.
they used it for the BBB, of which the current news cycle is distracting it from.
The speaker of the house– the subject of the article and of my comment– doesn’t negotiate with senators of either party. He needs a majority in his chamber.
the gop is so short sighted, they wanted a shutdown but dint have enough seats to end it, meaning its a impulsive thing.
They could, however, change the procedural rules that require 60 votes with a simple majority.