√𝛂𝛋𝛆Oct 11

Consent - no name

https://piefed.world/post/542622

Show threadIambusOct 12
That is borderline porn
Show threadAmnesigenicOct 12
Nudity isnt inherently sexual, your arousal is entirely your problem
Show threadseejurOct 13

Arousal is actually natural, acting on your arousal though, that’s another matter.

What differentiates humans from animals is the ability to resist our “instincts” and obey our brain, some missed that evolutionary step sadly

Show threadAmnesigenic
Arousal is natural, your weird puritanical reaction to non-sexual behaviors and situations like people literally just standing there wearing a costume is not
Oct 13 at 12:38amWeb
Show threadPhilMcGrawOct 13
I mean the cosplayer can do whatever they want, no judgement from me, but it’s clearly a costume that is made to be sexualised.
Show threadAmnesigenicOct 13
And the puritans thought the same was equally clear about bare ankles, your arbitrary standard of which visible body parts are normal vs sexual is just as dumb as theirs was. The only things humans do that are inherently sexual are actual sexual behaviors. Clothing is not fucking, nudity is not fucking.
Show threadPhilMcGrawOct 13
I’m not equating what she is wearing to “fucking”, but you’re talking as if it’s clearly some “oh this just feels comfortable” cosplay and not intentionally sexualised. Sexual attraction arousal and flirting starts before “fucking”.
Show threadAmnesigenicOct 13
There is nothing inherently sexual about it, clothing isn’t flirting, your arousal is your own problem
Show threadronl2kOct 13
Homo-sapiens have been on earth for about 250k years, and have been wearing clothes for only 100k years, after one of the severe ice ages that even affected Africa. We made nudity sexual.