Patrick BreyerOct 10
🇩🇪Ab heute MÜSSEN Plattformen dein Browser-Signal #DoNotTrack respektieren: Wer es setzt, darf keine personalisierte politische Werbung mehr sehen – ohne lästige Banner-Rückfragen! Prüft kritisch, ob Meta & Co sich daran halten und meldet Verstöße. https://www.patrick-breyer.de/politische-werbung-eu-parlament-bekaempft-cookie-banner-nicht-aber-waehlermanipulation-und-microtargeting/
Show threadmomoOct 10

@echo_pbreyer Here is how Firefox handles the situation:

- https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-turn-do-not-track-feature

How do I turn on the Do Not Track feature? | Firefox Help

This article describes the “Do Not Track” feature in Firefox 134 and below, that lets you tell websites not to track your browsing behavior.

Show threadgnumpen

@momo @echo_pbreyer

following your link you get
'Starting in Firefox version 135, the “Do Not Track” setting has been removed.' as the first sentence. So the question remains: Is GPC (the current strategy of mozilla in Firefox) legally binding as well?

Oct 10 at 10:21pmWeb
Show threadmomoOct 10
@gnumpen @echo_pbreyer I just wanted to cite what the state in firefox is like. I do not know about chrome and other browsers as I do not use them.
Show threadgnumpenOct 10

@momo @echo_pbreyer

I get that - I was merely pointing out that firefox actually does not support do-not-track anymore and moved on to use "Global Privacy Control (GPC)" instead. Thus it is not clear if the legally binding do-not-track extends to GPC as well.
If GPC is not legally binding like do-not-track then Firefox users won't benefit from this whole situation.

Show threadmomoOct 10
@gnumpen @echo_pbreyer I am sorry I do not know if GPC is legally binding as well. I posted my reply knowing what was written on that page.