Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme crushes Apple M4, Intel, and AMD in new benchmarks
Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme crushes Apple M4, Intel, and AMD in new benchmarks
They out desktop cooling on the testbench apparently.
They’re also comparing to only the base M4 chip, not the Pro.
Also the M5 could still come out this year. But it also might not so it’s still a fair comparison till then.
Windows with an X2 Elite or Mac with an M5.
Let me know when these X elite chips have full Linux compatibility and then I’ll be interested. Until then, if I’ll stick with Mac, it has the better hardware.
Yeah I guess, but it’s still annoying to have identically named tools that do the same job but aren’t compatible. Or, like, base64 -d on macos can gobble the last char of output. So then you have to homebrew coreutils or something, but it just means that stuff that you feel should work compatibly out-of-the-box doesn’t, and writing *nix scripts without perl is just a pita.
I forget what my point here is.
Also while Linux is not the same as UNIX, interacting with them is much more similar than, say, interacting with Windows.
If you use only GUI, the underlying system philosophy is practically irrelevant.
If you use CLI, you can literally use the same distribution within WSL as you use on a Linux computer. I like using openSUSE’s zypper in WSL more than I like brew on macOS.
I think I see what you’re saying. My gripe is that if I want a laptop/tablet with a great ARM chip, with long battery life, my options all force me to use one of two operating systems that I’d prefer not to use for ideological reasons. If I’m forced to use one, because I want an ARM device, I might as well use the one that has the best hardware. M5s are right around the corner and the MacBook Airs are really competitive.
If I misinterpreted your question, then no, as far as I’m aware, none of the M series has FULL support. The M1s and M2s are pretty close though.
Keep in mind the original X Elite benchmarks were never replicated in real world devices (not even close).
They used a desktop style device (with intense cooling that is not possible with laptops) and “developed solely for benchmarking” version of Linux (to this day X Elite runs like shit in Linux).
This is almost certainly a premeditated attempt at “legal false advertising”.
Mark my words, you’ll never see 4,000 points in GB6 ST on any real products.
M4 Max doesn’t have the fastest single core in Apple’s arsenal either, the king is A19 now (yup, the one in iPhones):
Ah. Thanks for the context.
Well, after they have product out, third parties will benchmark them, and we’ll see how they actually stack up.
desktop-class performance at mobile-class power draw
This made my bullshit detector go haywire.
The question was about GPU drivers, and GPU drivers for ARM-based SoCs aren’t even mature on Android. They are going to suck on Linux.
Compared to the drivers for Mali, Adreno and consorts, Nvidia is a bunch of saints, and we know how much Nvidia drivers suck under Linux.
There are quite a few more. For example Debian, Ubuntu, Manjaro, Arch, Fedora, Alpine and Kali also have ARM ports (and probably many others too). Raspberry OS is purpose-built for ARM Desktop. There’s others too.
Asahi isn’t specifically an ARM Linux, but an Apple Silicon Linux.
Apple Silicon is ARM, but it’s also its own semi-custom thing that’s not directly compatible with other ARM stuff.
That’s the main issue with supporting ARM: You don’t have one platform like x86/x64.
On x86/x64 there’s an abstraction between the machine code language and the microcode that’s actually executed in the CPU. There’s a microcode translation layer in the CPU that translates one to the other, so x86/x64 chip designers have a lot of freedom when designing their actual CPU. The downside being that the translation layer consumes a little bit of performance.
There’s also the UEFI system and a ton of other things that keep the platform stable and standardized, so that you can run essentially the same software on a 15yo Intel CPU and a modern AMD.
ARM is much more diverse. Some run Devicetree, some don’t. There are also multiple different ARM architectures, and since they are customizable, there’s just so much variety.
I don’t have personal experience with that, but according to google (www.linaro.org/blog/linux-on-snapdragon-x-elite) it is at least a thing.
Wouldn’t expect it to be great though.
How’s the GPU drivers though? Especially to me for Linux.
Not. The answer is not.
Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme
That doesn’t sound very high end, I think I’ll wait for the Pro version, preferably Pro Plus.
Don’t you want to put on some of this thermal paste?
Where this is going, baby, you don’t need no thermal paste!
faints on floor
Elite Extreme
Sounds like it focuses more on shiny RGB than performance.
desktop-class performance at mobile-class power draw
checks source
windowcentral.com
Nothing to see here, folks.