dani personally don’t find it very interesting!
it doesn’t solve “walk away without cooperation”, it doesn’t solve “aggregation at scale in a shared open world”, and it doesn’t solve “giving new life to old data” and “remixing products”.
it’s like comparing email with www. apples to oranges
Folker@danabra.mov I'm not sure if #atproto has solved that either, neither in practice nor in theory. In practice today #atmosphere is basically centralized in #bluesky, so if you are blocked on #bluesky, also migration would keep you invisible for basically everyone else. But also in theory for a "credible exit" and "giving new life to old data", which new service would accept you and retroactive moderate all your "old data" again? How would this work?
re: first point, there’s actually a real issue there with where moderation is currently applied but there’s ongoing work to fix that. see here for details
Update on Protocol Moderation ...
Update on Protocol Moderation ...
@danabra.mov It seems to me that this solves a different much simpler problem (and using only a "voluntary" fix which doesn't solve the more "adversarial" case), not the moderate-all-old-data-again problem, which is fundamental for real decentralization. Do I miss something?