@BobHorowitz I see you chose a very mild, SFW photo from Folsom. And they are indeed adorable.
@jeridansky Yes they are.
Being the mindful guy I'm supposed to be, I have a dozen shots I cannot post here. *sigh*
@BobHorowitz Not without a CW, anyway.
@jeridansky @BobHorowitz Oh interesting, the rule at sfba.social says "Mark content that contains nudity, gore, violence, etc. as sensitive and clearly label it with a content warning and/or hashtag." I thought it was less friendly to sexual/nude content but maybe the rule changed or I had misremembered it.

@soaproot @jeridansky
I don't know about the past but I think the current sfba guidelines are fair and easy to understand. Also, they have a lot of wiggle room. That means people have to use their own good judgment when it comes to fuzzy edges. Me, admittedly sometimes lacking good judgment... well twice asked the moderators about pictures before posting. The moderators are cool 👍

Some of the pictures I won't post have stray peens and tuchuses. There was a lot of that at Folsom... I'm very comfortable with that but other people aren't.

The other pictures I won't post could become targets for derision... i.e. someone dressed as an inflatable sex doll. They were having fun and enjoying the day, and were kind enough to let me take their picture with consent. They don't need the judgment of others outside the confines of the street fair.

@BobHorowitz @jeridansky This is as good an excuse as any to say again what I've said before: sfba.social mods are amazing! So glad we have them.
@soaproot On behalf of the entire moderation team: Thank you!
@BobHorowitz it's spelt "folsom" but pronounced "wholesome"
@jon_ellis
*nods*
I've been puzzling over whether I should have labeled this wildlife or wild life.

@BobHorowitz

Very rare and elusive wildlife 🤭 *rawr*

@NyakoKitty
We saw a coyote on the street right outside our front windows last week. This was way way better.