anticolonialistCreating problems then arresting you them
ComradeSharkfuckerThank you tyrannitar
sad_detective_manOh Tyrannitar of the burning trashpile horizon. What other wisdom do you dispense?
Well, to be fair, comunism also created poverty.
Maybe it’s the shity humans that get elected (or not), that create poverty, not necessarily the system
Government is the legislative arm of capitalism. Capitalism is designed to concentrate wealth at the top at the expense of the working class.
PixeIOrangeNo. Capitalism punishes socialism systems (communism never existet) so poverty can rise even in them.
The main problem of humankind is capitalism.
Capitalism creates new products that get rids of the old products that it doesn’t need anymore. It’s constantly evolving. Rule of the fittest… So about those poor people, now that the autocrats have been elected… mmmmhhh
But let’s be honest, communism just ignores that products are important…
Capitalism creates nothing except the need for constant consumption, labor creates everything. We can live without capitalism, capitalism can not survive without us.
Under capitalism you get the product that will generate most money for the shareholders, while disregarding all else. Not the product that you want or need, sometimes you even get the exact opposite and are confident that you want it more than all else, and gladely will pay money for said uneeded unwanted proudct, cause they took away your ability to think clear. Enjoy these last few years while it all crumbles down.
Capitalism needs poverty, which is why it creates poverty
And why dems okay not addressing it or letting what limited help they do expire
Democrats have never been concerned about easing the struggle of the working class. Their purpose is to pacify the working class with meaningless gestures, and hollow platitudes
DaftyduxErm. I think Im in the wrong place.
Yeah, your right, there is no reason for capitalism to create poverty except to reduce upwards pressure on wages. Also, it’s a good thing that some people are billionaires. Clearly, the billionaires deserve to be billionaires and the people in poverty deserve to be in poverty. /S
Sigh. Such intelect. Truly astonishing.
Thanks, I try not to show it off too much. Glad you learned something.
Mission accompished?
Valid point, there is only so much you can learn from one reply. I suggest you look for more knowledge. The YouTube channel Unlearning Economics does some pretty good econ videos.
Mmhmmm.
Love how you failed to spell intellect correctly.
Lmao.
capitalism doesnt create poverty.
How? It’s entire design is to extract all the wealth from the bottom to funnel to the top? Especially in our current system where the only thing that matters is short term profits and continuous growth.
Hell monopoly was created to show how terrible the system was by making the point driving everyone else into bankruptcy
Just look up the definition of poverty. Poverty is bound to exsist in any society where there is scarcity. Thats just… survival
Which capitalism uses to break people down for others profits. Don’t do what the rich say hello being unhoused, or unable to feed yourself and family or just unable to get medical attention.
Perhaps that is true. But the system capitalism thrives on created poverty. Thus, cause and effect become indistinguishable.
www.ecosia.org/search?q=walmart+welfare+workers
Regional effects may be to blame, like famine of old, for sure. But in the modern world, capitalism blocks attempts to end poverty, by all means possible: wage suppression, lobbying against health care reform, and against consumer advocacy, and against unions, just to name a tiny fraction.
Billionaires can’t exist without poverty. Buying power demands this. Consumers on spend so much, can only spend what they earn.
Profit comes only from the spending power of the masses, as a general rule. To take a greater share, someone has to take a lesser share.
Fantasies abound of a financial world where this rule does not apply, yet all but a smidgeon of finance rests on commodities, utilities, rent, and consumer spending, sitting at the bottom of the pyramid of cards, or maybe just a scheme.
More markets? More growth. Sure, let’s see that end poverty. The end of poverty is to lessen the share of the rich. It is just common sense.
