@anildash are people ever "genuinely objective"? You probably mean some form of "lack of strong emotions towards AI" but I'd argue that that - given the real impacts and flaws of AI - creates a bit of a false middle ground.
Even though you might not see it as that I would call a lot of them the (neo-)luddites. But I feel like you are looking for something different that is a lot harder to pin down because they can't be structurally critical which kinda limits the target a lot.
I wonder how useful defining that group is though. Is there a neutral position when looking at something actively harming many of the structures defining our world?
@jplebreton @tante @anildash It doesn't really have to be about Grok or whatever. I think the cohort Anil is talking about (evidenced by his mention of Simon) is one that I have a foot in myself -- for example, in my hobby time I'm working with fully local voice assistant tech that uses small LLMs at different levels of the stack, all in service of not sending recordings of my house to Amazon or Google.
"Objective" is probably the wrong word though.