Some thoughts from a guy who's tracked more than 2,500 studies on #COVID19's chronic impact:

- I naively thought this would be a short-term project and that once the long-term risks were clear, people would take COVID seriously.

- I didn't expect risks of Long COVID to accumulate with each infection as they do. I thought LC might decline over time.

- It's depressing to see how quickly we knew of COVID's chronic harm--early studies were published in 2020/21, and we ignored them.

1/3

- I thought we might learn of COVID's impact on cancer risks more quickly, but this takes a lot of time and study to understand.

- I had no idea when I started of the breadth of harm COVID might cause. My spreadsheet has tabs for cardiovascular, brain/neuro, cancer, immune, pregnancy, and other. I could've had tabs for pulmonary, fatigue, cognitive issues, psych issues, and reproductive system risks and filled those with dozens of studies. (They are all in the "other" category.)

2/3

- I never thought I'd need a tab for pediatric studies, but there are several dozen of those that have been published. (Studies of COVID in kids are scattered in other tabs.)

- Reading this many studies makes it easier to be COVID cautious, but it's still not easy. I see my friends doing things I want to do and going places I want to go. They don't understand the risks they're accepting, but it sure looks like fun to pretend everything is normal.

Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12VbMkvqUF9eSggJsdsFEjKs5x0ABxQJi5tvfzJIDd3U/edit?usp=sharing

COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 Studies

Google Docs
@augieray I totally feel you. I see friends out having fun too and then I start to wonder, am I the crazy one here? Why aren’t most people concerned with all this research? I understand that most of them may not be aware of it, but I’ve asked people if they want me to send them research on it and they don’t want it. They’d rather live in the dark. Yeah, I get we all feel overwhelmed with things but to not ever look at some of it seems irresponsible.
@LoganFive
I find it wild especially from parents - when else does society deem it acceptable to go "actually I don't want to know about the risks my children are facing"?? 🤯
@augieray

@3TomatoesShort

Back in the 1800s, English people used to send their babies to baby farms. Not having to nurse helped the mother recover faster, so she could return to her usual chores, and besides it wasn't acceptable for the husband to ask for sex until the baby was weaned. So let's wean it right away, so much more convenient!

And 'baby farming' was a way poorer women, in the country, could make money doing feminine work. So it was fine.

@3TomatoesShort

The babies almost all died. There was no formula, and giving them bread-in-water was much cheaper than hiring wet-nurses.
Babies with their mothers died sometimes, but baby farms had a sky-high death rate.

Everyone knew. Everyone pretended they didn't know. It would be so inconvenient to keep babies at home. They just said, "How tragic."

That cured me of believing people when they talk about "protecting children".

@Kathmandu
It was, but I don't think anyone would find that acceptable *now*? 💔

@3TomatoesShort @LoganFive @augieray well, I know about the risks. But I can't keep constantly reading about them (also my therapist advised against it), because I can't really avoid them. I have to send the kids to school (no home schooling options in Germany). They will get infected there.

It's like reading about horrible traffic accidents all day while your kids need to learn how to navigate traffic and ride their bikes anyway. Parents need to compartmentalize in order to keep sane.

@megaphon
That's completely understandable, and not at all the same as refusing to learn about the risks entirely. I'm sorry society has put you in such an impossible situation.
@LoganFive @augieray