big awoo notationI want to see if the thoughts of others align with mine.
An FPGA toolchain should optimise for:
An FPGA toolchain should optimise for:
highest worst-case Fmax
highest average Fmax
highest best-case Fmax
Poll ended at .
Luke Wren@lofty Depends how many parallel jobs I am allowed to submit to get that golden seed 😅
@wren6991 I'm computing distributions of 100 runs, so
@lofty If I'm comparing RTL changes for fmax then I'll usually do ~100 runs and take the median. Seems reasonable because 8 runs aiming for median frequency should have only a 0.4% chance of all failing. Most client machines have 8 parallel threads of execution available these days.
I don't particularly care about the mean because if I get a worst-case result then you can bet I'm re-rolling, so the tail values don't matter.
I don't think it's *good* that seed sweeping is the optimal way of using the tools, but the fact is it reduces variance as well as increasing expected fmax.
@lofty Also bear in mind my comparison point here is Vivado which has a >> 0.4% chance of just segfaulting for no apparent reason, so I find that kind of probability acceptable
mei@wren6991 @lofty one trick i've seen for dealing with fpga toolchains that i really like is to LD_PRELOAD this bad boy. makes them much less flakey.
zSchön 
AMS@TheAlgorythm @mei They're static so 0 on first call. Calling free on NULL is defined as no-op.
zSchön :disability_flag: (@[email protected])
@[email protected] @[email protected] Oh, ok. Didn’t know the exceptions of static.